ctrl+c handling in core/commandline #2788
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedIgnore keyword(s) in the title. Ignored keywords (2)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI Application
participant OS
User->>CLI Application: Execute command
CLI Application-->>CLI Application: Context with cancel
OS->>CLI Application: Send SIGINT (Ctrl+C)
CLI Application-->>CLI Application: Cancel context
CLI Application->>User: Prompt for new command
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
- Added SIGINT and SIGTERM handling for graceful Ctrl+C interruptions
- Passed context to
newInteractiveClientfor proper cancellation - Introduced tests for handling SIGINT signals in
shell_test.go - Verified application robustness against unexpected exits on SIGINT
2 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- core/commandline/shell.go (3 hunks)
- core/commandline/shell_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
core/commandline/shell_test.go (1)
54-63: Review the setup inTestMainfor capturing SIGINT.
- Using
signal.Notifyto capture and log SIGINT signals is a good approach to prevent the test process from exiting unexpectedly.- The asynchronous handling of the signal using a goroutine is correctly implemented. However, ensure that the test logs are properly captured and reviewed, as this setup could potentially interfere with other tests if not isolated correctly.
- Consider adding more robust error handling or cleanup procedures to manage the test environment more effectively.
core/commandline/shell_test.go
Outdated
| func TestSignalHandling(t *testing.T) { | ||
| shellCommands := []*cli.Command{ | ||
| { | ||
| Name: "test", | ||
| Usage: "test command", | ||
| Action: func(c *cli.Context) error { | ||
| return nil | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| app := &cli.App{ | ||
| Commands: []*cli.Command{ | ||
| GenerateShellCommand(shellCommands), | ||
| }, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Set up a context that we can cancel | ||
| ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background()) | ||
| defer cancel() | ||
|
|
||
| go func() { | ||
| time.Sleep(1 * time.Second) | ||
| p, err := os.FindProcess(os.Getpid()) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| t.Errorf("Failed to find process: %v", err) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| if err := p.Signal(syscall.SIGINT); err != nil { | ||
| t.Errorf("Failed to send SIGINT: %v", err) | ||
| } | ||
| }() | ||
|
|
||
| err := app.RunContext(ctx, []string{"app", "shell"}) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| t.Fatalf("app.RunContext failed: %v", err) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Ensure proper cleanup and context handling in TestSignalHandling.
- The
TestSignalHandlingfunction correctly sets up a context and sends aSIGINTsignal to the process. - The test includes error handling for the signal sending process.
- The
rgoutput indicates thatSIGINThandling is implemented inshell.go, but there are no explicit assertions or logs inshell_test.goto verify that the application respects theSIGINTsignal in terms of state changes or cleanup.
To improve the test, consider adding assertions or logs to confirm that the application performs the expected cleanup when receiving a SIGINT.
Analysis chain
Ensure proper cleanup and context handling in TestSignalHandling.
- The use of
defer cancel()after creating a context withcontext.WithCancelis a good practice to ensure resources are properly released. - Sending a SIGINT to the process using
os.FindProcessandp.Signalis correctly implemented. However, consider handling potential errors more robustly or ensuring the test fails gracefully if the setup fails. - The test checks the application's response to SIGINT, but it could be improved by verifying that the application indeed respects the SIGINT in terms of state changes or cleanup.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the SIGINT handling correctly stops the application and cleans up resources.
# Test: Search for logs or state changes indicating proper SIGINT handling.
rg --type go "SIGINT"
Length of output: 517
| ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(c.Context) | ||
| go func() { | ||
| for range sigs { | ||
| fmt.Printf("\n(type \"%s\", \"%s\" or \"%s\" to exit)\n\n >", quitCommand, exitCommand, quitCommandShort) | ||
| for sig := range sigs { | ||
| if sig == syscall.SIGINT || sig == syscall.SIGTERM { | ||
| cancel() | ||
| fmt.Printf("\n(type \"%s\", \"%s\" or \"%s\" to exit)\n\n >", quitCommand, exitCommand, quitCommandShort) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance signal handling and context management in GenerateShellCommand.
- The integration of
context.WithCanceland the setup of signal handling withsignal.Notifyfor SIGINT and SIGTERM are well-implemented. This ensures that the command can gracefully handle termination signals. - Consider adding more detailed logging or feedback mechanisms to inform the user about the state changes when signals are received. This could improve user experience and debuggability.
- Ensure that the signal handling does not interfere with other parts of the application, especially in a multi-threaded environment.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2788 +/- ##
===================================================
+ Coverage 25.66686% 25.67840% +0.01154%
===================================================
Files 699 699
Lines 51510 51518 +8
Branches 80 80
===================================================
+ Hits 13221 13229 +8
+ Misses 36939 36938 -1
- Partials 1350 1351 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
kathiouchka
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
(updates since last review)
- Enhanced signal handling for better interruption management during command execution
- Added unit tests to verify signal handling functionality in the command-line interface
- Removed
core/commandline/shell_test.go, which contained tests for SIGINT handling
1 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
kathiouchka
changed the title
|
I've attempted to test the code generated by greptile in the issue using multiple tests: Client Test: I created a custom client, ran the shell, executed a sleep command, and tried to interrupt it using both a manual Ctrl+C and a SIGINT sent through the test code. Unfortunately, none of these methods successfully terminated the sleep command. This led me to suspect a problem with my shell, but when I conducted the same tests outside of the generated shell, they worked correctly, indicating the issue lies within the generated shell itself. Direct Signal Test: I also tried sending signals directly from a main program to the generated shell. Running this manually also failed to deliver the signal to the spawned shell. I hope my failures can help you. @golangisfun123 |
Description
Simply Integrated grepitle code after working a few hours on testing it without success - more details in comments
Summary by CodeRabbit