Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(synapse-interface): RFQ input vs bridgeQuote validation #2742

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024

Conversation

abtestingalpha
Copy link
Collaborator

@abtestingalpha abtestingalpha commented Jun 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the BridgeTransactionButton to include new calculations for token decimals and values.
    • Enhanced button logic to consider additional conditions for enabling/disabling, improving transaction accuracy and reliability.

950938f: synapse-interface preview link
b07ed8c: synapse-interface preview link

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The BridgeTransactionButton.tsx component has been updated to include new calculations for fromTokenDecimals, fromValueBigInt, and bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq. These calculations, implemented using useMemo, are used to determine the button's disabled state alongside existing conditions like isLoading, isBridgePaused, and balance checks.

Changes

Files Summary
packages/synapse-interface/.../BridgeTransactionButton.tsx Added new calculations for fromTokenDecimals, fromValueBigInt, and bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq. These changes adjust the condition logic for enabling or disabling the button.

Poem

In code so fine, we tweak with care,
Decimal places counted, none to spare.
A button waits, so poised, so sleek,
Disabled or not, the logic we seek.
Through memos and states, we find our way,
Bridging tokens, come what may.
🚀✨🔧


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 26.06700%. Comparing base (80aa943) to head (b6461b6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##              master       #2742   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage   26.06700%   26.06700%           
=============================================
  Files            692         692           
  Lines          50539       50539           
  Branches          80          80           
=============================================
  Hits           13174       13174           
  Misses         36023       36023           
  Partials        1342        1342           
Flag Coverage Δ
packages 90.47619% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Deploying sanguine with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: b6461b6
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://bdce60c4.sanguine.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://fe-bridge-quote-validation.sanguine.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80aa943 and 36a35d2.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/synapse-interface/components/StateManagedBridge/BridgeTransactionButton.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
packages/synapse-interface/components/StateManagedBridge/BridgeTransactionButton.tsx

[error] 71-71: Change to an optional chain. (lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/synapse-interface/components/StateManagedBridge/BridgeTransactionButton.tsx (3)

73-75: The calculation of fromValueBigInt using useMemo is correctly implemented to optimize performance by recalculating only when fromValue or fromTokenDecimals changes.


77-82: The logic to determine if the bridge quote amount is greater than the input for RFQ is correctly encapsulated within a useMemo hook, optimizing the component's performance.


90-90: Ensure that the conditions for disabling the button and setting button properties are comprehensive and accurately reflect the intended logic, especially with the new bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq condition.

Also applies to: 124-128

Verification successful

To verify the review comment, we need to check the following:

  1. The definition and calculation of bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq.
  2. How bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq is used to determine the button's state (e.g., disabled state and properties).

Let's start by finding where bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq is defined and how it is calculated.


Next, we need to locate how bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq is used within the component to determine the button's state and properties.


To verify the conditions for disabling the button and setting its properties, we need to extract and analyze the surrounding code where bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq is used.


The variable bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq is used in the conditions for disabling the button and setting its properties. The conditions appear to be comprehensive and accurately reflect the intended logic.

  • The button is disabled if bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq is true.
  • The button's properties are set to display "Invalid bridge quote" when bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq is true.

These conditions ensure that the button's state is managed correctly based on the new logic introduced.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the button's disabled state and properties are set correctly across different application states.

# Test: Check if the button's state changes appropriately under different conditions.
echo "Manual testing needed to verify button states under various conditions."

Length of output: 152



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the definition and calculation of `bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq` in the specified file.
ast-grep --lang tsx --pattern 'const bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq = $_' packages/synapse-interface/components/StateManagedBridge/BridgeTransactionButton.tsx

Length of output: 936



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the usage of `bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq` within the specified file.
rg 'bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq' packages/synapse-interface/components/StateManagedBridge/BridgeTransactionButton.tsx

Length of output: 298



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract and display the surrounding code where `bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq` is used.
rg -A 5 -B 5 'bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq' packages/synapse-interface/components/StateManagedBridge/BridgeTransactionButton.tsx

Length of output: 1174

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jun 19, 2024

Deploying sanguine-fe with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: b6461b6
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://5a62c1a1.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://fe-bridge-quote-validation.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 36a35d2 and b6461b6.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/synapse-interface/components/StateManagedBridge/BridgeTransactionButton.tsx (4 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
packages/synapse-interface/components/StateManagedBridge/BridgeTransactionButton.tsx

[error] 66-66: Change to an optional chain. (lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/synapse-interface/components/StateManagedBridge/BridgeTransactionButton.tsx (2)

68-70: Good use of useMemo for optimizing performance when calculating fromValueBigInt.


72-77: Correct implementation of useMemo for the bridgeQuoteAmountGreaterThanInputForRfq calculation. This logic is crucial for the new validation feature.

Comment on lines +65 to +67
const fromTokenDecimals: number | undefined =
fromToken && fromToken?.decimals[fromChainId]

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use optional chaining for safer and cleaner code.

-  const fromTokenDecimals: number | undefined = fromToken && fromToken?.decimals[fromChainId]
+  const fromTokenDecimals: number | undefined = fromToken?.decimals[fromChainId]
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const fromTokenDecimals: number | undefined =
fromToken && fromToken?.decimals[fromChainId]
const fromTokenDecimals: number | undefined = fromToken?.decimals[fromChainId]
Tools
Biome

[error] 66-66: Change to an optional chain. (lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

@abtestingalpha abtestingalpha merged commit f354813 into master Jun 26, 2024
38 checks passed
@abtestingalpha abtestingalpha deleted the fe/bridge-quote-validation branch June 26, 2024 14:37
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants