Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PHP 8.4] Add bcdivmod #503

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 1.x
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[PHP 8.4] Add bcdivmod #503

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Ayesh
Copy link
Contributor

@Ayesh Ayesh commented Sep 24, 2024

@Ayesh Ayesh changed the title add bcdivmod [PHP 8.4] Add bcdivmod Sep 24, 2024
@@ -60,3 +60,7 @@ function mb_ltrim(string $string, ?string $characters = null, ?string $encoding
function mb_rtrim(string $string, ?string $characters = null, ?string $encoding = null): string { return p\Php84::mb_rtrim($string, $characters, $encoding); }
}
}

if (function_exists('bcdiv')) {
function bcdivmod(string $num1, string $num2, ?int $scale = null): array {return p\Php84::bcdivmod($num1, $num2, $scale); }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

such polyfill function should be defined only when the bcmath extension is loaded (similar to how we deal with mbstring new functions just above)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was thinking the function_exists('bcdiv') call will check for this, and will also play nicely with any potential polyfills that may declare a bcdiv function. If you think, I can update this with a full extension_loaded call.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh, I missed that this was checking bcdiv and not bcdivmod. But then, it misses the check for bcdivmod (all polyfilled functions need to be guarded to avoid double function definition).

and for the detection of bcmath, please use extension_loaded for consistency with our other polyfills. Thus, a extension_loaded call is fully resolved at compile-time by OPCache.

*
* @dataProvider bcDivModProvider
*/
public function testBcDivMod(string $num1, string $num2, ?int $scale = null, array $expected): void
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this test needs @requires extension bcmath as the implementation would break without that extension

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Brilliant, thank you.

Comment on lines +174 to +184
if ($num2 === '0') {
throw new \DivisionByZeroError('Division by zero');
}

if (!is_numeric($num1)) {
throw new \ValueError('Argument #1 ($num1) is not well-formed');
}

if (!is_numeric($num2)) {
throw new \ValueError('Argument #2 ($num2) is not well-formed');
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Those two errors are not available on PHP 7. I suggest to emit a E_USER_WARNING and return null instead if we're on PHP < 8.


public static function bcDivModProvider(): iterable
{
yield ['10', '10', null, ['1', '0']];
Copy link
Member

@derrabus derrabus Sep 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple more tests would be nice. You're only testing the simplest path.

Also, beware that by setting the scale to null, your test depends on the global bcmath.scale setting. Currently, the test will fail if it's run in an environment where that setting is not 0.

@Ayesh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ayesh commented Sep 25, 2024

Thanks a lot for the reviews @stof @derrabus, really appreciate them, genuinely helpful ones.
I will flesh out the polyfill and the tests soon.

@stof
Copy link
Member

stof commented Nov 22, 2024

@Ayesh can you update your PR ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants