Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[5.10] Fix filesystem test on macOS #461

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MaxDesiatov
Copy link
Contributor

@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov commented Jan 26, 2024

  • Explanation: It looks like we end up with EEXISTS here on newer versions of macOS.
  • Scope: Any test runs on macOS will fail because of this issue.
  • Risk: Low, it doesn't impact existing file system error handling.
  • Testing: This new file system error case is specifically handled in tests.
  • Reviewer: @neonichu
  • Main branch PR: Fix filesystem test on macOS #460

It looks like we end up with `EEXISTS` here on newer versions of macOS.
@MaxDesiatov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci test

@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov changed the title Fix filesystem test on macOS [5.10] Fix filesystem test on macOS Jan 26, 2024
@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov added the swift 5.10 This PR targets the 5.10 branch label Jan 26, 2024
@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov merged commit 2d452ec into main Jan 26, 2024
3 checks passed
@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov deleted the fix-tests-on-macos-5.10 branch January 26, 2024 21:41
@finagolfin
Copy link
Member

Merged into wrong branch?

@finagolfin
Copy link
Member

Yep, this commit did nothing, 2d452ec.

@finagolfin
Copy link
Member

Ping @MaxDesiatov, this was merged to the wrong branch, please submit for 5.10.

@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov restored the fix-tests-on-macos-5.10 branch February 5, 2024 15:34
@shahmishal shahmishal deleted the fix-tests-on-macos-5.10 branch May 4, 2024 21:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
swift 5.10 This PR targets the 5.10 branch test suite
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants