Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make rls work #30

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2018
Merged

Make rls work #30

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2018

Conversation

kdy1
Copy link
Member

@kdy1 kdy1 commented Feb 3, 2018

rust-analysis chokes with Option<Box<Expr>> style fields.
Rls only shows a warning on the crate with that fields, but ICEs on
dependent crates.
This can be workarounded by using Option<(Box<Expr>)>.

Also, using multiple glob imports is bad for rls.
So this commit deglobs them.

rust-analysis chokes with `Option<Box<Expr>>` style fields.
Rls only shows a warning on the crate with that fields, but ICEs on
dependent crates.
This can be workarounded by using `Option<(Box<Expr>)>`.

Also, using multiple glob imports is bad for rls.
So this commit deglobs them.
@kdy1
Copy link
Member Author

kdy1 commented Feb 3, 2018

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2018
30: Make rls work r=kdy1 a=kdy1

rust-analysis chokes with `Option<Box<Expr>>` style fields.
Rls only shows a warning on the crate with that fields, but ICEs on
dependent crates.
This can be workarounded by using `Option<(Box<Expr>)>`.

Also, using multiple glob imports is bad for rls.
So this commit deglobs them.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Feb 3, 2018

Build succeeded

@bors bors bot merged commit fa40c8d into swc-project:master Feb 3, 2018
@kdy1 kdy1 deleted the rls branch February 3, 2018 12:20
@swc-project swc-project locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 19, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant