Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to depend on lsp-2.4.0.0 #1762

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 12, 2024
Merged

Update to depend on lsp-2.4.0.0 #1762

merged 8 commits into from
Feb 12, 2024

Conversation

byorgey
Copy link
Member

@byorgey byorgey commented Feb 11, 2024

Update to use the lsp-2.4 API. Closes #1350.

Initially I hoped that any lsp-2.x would work. However, the SeverDefinition record changed in 2.2 so I initially set that as a lower bound. But then it turns out that 2.4 changed which module it is importing Rope from; since we work with ropes in the Hover module it matters since we have to import the matching module. Updating to the new Rope type also required some changes as the API provided by the new Rope.Mixed module is a bit different than the old module, so we would not even be able to easily put in CPP to conditionally depend on the right rope module depending on the lsp version. Finally, this means dropping support for GHC 9.0 since lsp-2.4 does not support it.

Along the way I also fixed a minor issue related to showing type information returned by the LSP server, so that it uses prettyTypeLine to display the type on a single line (in my editor, when the type does not use a single line it gets cut off). For comparison see also #1610.

This refactoring was a big pain because a lot of things (names of types and constructors, locations of exports, etc...) changed from 1.x to 2.x, but there was not much in the way of documenting what had changed. =( I am pretty sure that all functionality has been preserved but I would appreciate independent confirmation.

This is also a prerequisite for updating other dependencies such as the base version (I will open a follow-up PR soon) since the old lsp-1.x versions do not allow many newer versions of various dependencies.

Towards #1350.

This is a giant pain in the butt.  Lots of names, function signatures,
etc. changed and there doesn't seem to be any documentation/migration
guide explaining how to update.
No idea if it actually works, probably not
@restyled-io restyled-io bot mentioned this pull request Feb 11, 2024
@byorgey byorgey requested a review from kostmo February 11, 2024 21:03
@byorgey byorgey changed the title Update to lsp 2.x Update to depend on lsp-2.4.0.0 Feb 12, 2024
Copy link
Member

@kostmo kostmo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for slogging through this.

Approving but I won't have time to try it out for a while.

@byorgey byorgey added the merge me Trigger the merge process of the Pull request. label Feb 12, 2024
@byorgey
Copy link
Member Author

byorgey commented Feb 12, 2024

@kostmo No worries, thanks! Everything I've tried seems to work, so I'll merge and of course we can open an issue if you discover any regressions later.

@byorgey byorgey removed the merge me Trigger the merge process of the Pull request. label Feb 12, 2024
@byorgey
Copy link
Member Author

byorgey commented Feb 12, 2024

Have to merge manually since the mergify configuration changed.

@byorgey byorgey merged commit c4a6e27 into main Feb 12, 2024
7 checks passed
@byorgey byorgey deleted the refactor/update-lsp branch February 12, 2024 17:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update to lsp-2.0
2 participants