Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optional additional parameter when using object in swaggertype #844

Merged

Conversation

mlesar
Copy link
Contributor

@mlesar mlesar commented Nov 27, 2020

Describe the PR
Not requiring an additional parameter to be set when using object in swaggertype.

Relation issue
#843

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #844 (4da4be6) into master (ee29e2b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #844   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.88%   84.88%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines        1654     1654           
=======================================
  Hits         1404     1404           
  Misses        145      145           
  Partials      105      105           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
schema.go 98.71% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ee29e2b...4da4be6. Read the comment docs.

@sdghchj sdghchj merged commit 031a42d into swaggo:master Nov 29, 2020
@sdghchj
Copy link
Member

sdghchj commented Nov 29, 2020

Thank you

@mlesar mlesar deleted the swaggertype-object-optional-second-parameter branch November 30, 2020 07:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants