Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

alternative approach to mutating props #10788

Merged

Conversation

Rich-Harris
Copy link
Member

makes the prop function slightly more efficient, limiting the cost to non-runes components

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 13, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 9d3578d

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@dummdidumm
Copy link
Member

dummdidumm commented Mar 13, 2024

Doh, I just now realize that you were proposing making this a sequence expression (didn't count all the brackets and commas right) and therefore only ever have one argument, if any - yeah that makes sense.

@dummdidumm dummdidumm merged commit f0380fd into component-binding-mutation Mar 13, 2024
8 checks passed
@dummdidumm dummdidumm deleted the component-binding-mutation-alt branch March 13, 2024 14:06
Rich-Harris added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
* fix: handle component binding mutation

#10359 (comment)

* alternative approach to mutating props (#10788)

Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rich Harris <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants