Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Browser support #558

Open
Rich-Harris opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 30 comments
Open

Browser support #558

Rich-Harris opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 30 comments
Labels
documentation popular more than 20 upthumbs
Milestone

Comments

@Rich-Harris
Copy link
Member

A few people have asked about browser support. We probably should be able to answer the question conclusively (maybe even running some tests in Browserstack or whatever?), and perhaps tell people which polyfills they'll need.

For example, window.performance.now isn't supported in IE9, but is used in transitions (#525 (comment)).

@kaisermann
Copy link
Member

kaisermann commented Apr 18, 2018

It also doesn't (completely) work in Safari 5.1: the querySelector(':checked') always returns []

@arxpoetica
Copy link
Member

I marked this as a v1 Q, but it's also relevant to v2-- I think it's just a matter of documenting the expectations. Is this documented somewhere other than the blog post, or is that sufficient enough?

@jihchi
Copy link

jihchi commented Apr 23, 2018

Also, Object.create isn't supported in IE8

@JohnRiv
Copy link

JohnRiv commented Apr 23, 2018

The lack of some sort of official browser support matrix is what is preventing me from being able to use Svelte at work. IE11 & Safari 10 support is what I'm particularly interested in, although others may need support for older versions of those browsers as well.

@JohnRiv
Copy link

JohnRiv commented May 7, 2018

I haven't had a chance to try out this ESLint plugin yet, but I wonder if this will answer our question: https://github.com/instea/eslint-plugin-builtin-compat

@kaisermann
Copy link
Member

@JohnRiv If you want to use v2.0.0+, the ES5 constraint was dropped (#1359). I'm currently using it in a very old webkit environment by polyfilling it with @babel/preset-env and it's working fine (for now).

@mblarsen
Copy link

IE11 const in for not supported

for (const k in src) tar[k] = src[k];

@guilhermeocosta
Copy link

Any news on that? I'll probably run it with @babel/preset-env, but know which polyfills I'll need could be very helpful.

@ai
Copy link

ai commented Aug 21, 2019

It will be nice to have a browser support policy on the website or docs. Will be good for using Svelte in big business.

@andrewdc
Copy link

andrewdc commented Dec 6, 2019

I'm bumping this - cause I got my org on board with Svelte, and am working to support IE11. I got 100% of the way there with: https://blog.az.sg/posts/svelte-and-ie11/

But then we added in some async/await stuff for grabbing data, and everything is broken again. I feel like we are getting pretty close (I'm sure it's just the right magical combination of Babel, Nodent, core-js, regenerate, etc....) but I have been plunging the internet for a few days trying to find the missing link.

Cheers though otherwise. Once this works, we will be flying high.

@andrewdc
Copy link

andrewdc commented Dec 6, 2019

This just in: we needed Babel for polyfilling all the promise, async/await stuff etc. But we also needed:
https://github.com/github/fetch
to Polyfill the fetch. And now things are working in IE11. If anyone else gets stuck with this, bug me. I know very little, but I can at least describe how this works, and what we did to get it there. hahaha! Cheers!

@rbenzazon
Copy link

@andrewdc yes please go ahead and give me your configuration I'm interested

@dreitzner
Copy link
Contributor

If anyone is interested I made an app around Christmas which supported ES6+ for modern and ES5 for older Browsers in parallel.

@andrewdc
Copy link

andrewdc commented May 6, 2020

@andrewdc yes please go ahead and give me your configuration I'm interested

So, here is the config chunk for our Legacy bundle. I recommend the Rollup plugin polyfill, as it will inject the whatwg-fetch polyfill automatically.

Unfortunately, all of this stuff inflates the bundle a huge amount, but it all does work.
Hope this helps.

{
    //Legacy Bundle creation
    input: !production ? "src/index.ts" : "src/components/components.module.js",
    output: {
      file: "public/bundle.legacy.js",
      sourcemap: false,
      format: "umd",
      name,
    },
    plugins: [
      svelte({
        dev: false,
        emitCss: false,
      }),
      resolve({
        browser: true,
        dedupe: importee =>
          importee === "svelte" || importee.startsWith("svelte/"),
      }),
      commonjs(),
      json(),
      babel({
        extensions: [".js", ".mjs", ".html", ".svelte"],
        runtimeHelpers: true,
        exclude: ["node_modules/@babel/**", "node_modules/core-js/**"],
        presets: [
          [
            "@babel/preset-env",
            {
              targets: {
                ie: "11",
              },
              useBuiltIns: "usage",
              corejs: 3,
            },
          ],
        ],
        plugins: [
          "@babel/plugin-syntax-dynamic-import",
          "@babel/plugin-syntax-import-meta",
          [
            "@babel/plugin-transform-runtime",
            {
              useESModules: true,
            },
          ],
        ],
      }),
      polyfill(["whatwg-fetch"]),
      preprocess,
      terser(),
    ],
    watch: {
      clearScreen: false,
    },
  },

@dreitzner
Copy link
Contributor

dreitzner commented May 7, 2020

My approach which only loads legacy code for older browsers.

{
 // all polyfills are referenced here
		input: 'src/polyfill.js',
		output: {
			sourcemap: true,
			format: 'iife',
			name: 'app',
			file: 'public/legacy/polyfill.js'
		},
		plugins: [
			// cleanup
			del({ targets: 'public/legacy/*' }),
			// If you have external dependencies installed from
			// npm, you'll most likely need these plugins. In
			// some cases you'll need additional configuration —
			// consult the documentation for details:
			// https://github.com/rollup/rollup-plugin-commonjs
			resolve({
				browser: true,
				dedupe: importee => importee === 'svelte' || importee.startsWith('svelte/')
			}),
			commonjs(),
			notLocal && terser(),
		]
	},
{
    // ... svelte build
}

my html setup:

<script type="module" src='/bundles/bundle.js'></script>
<script nomodule defer src="/legacy/polyfill.js"></script>
<script nomodule defer src="/legacy/bundle.js"></script>

my build command:
"build": "rollup -c && npx babel public/bundles --out-dir public/legacy --presets=@babel/preset-env",
which uses the following:

devDependencies:
"@babel/cli": "^7.7.0",
"@babel/core": "^7.7.2",
"@babel/preset-env": "^7.6.3",

"browserslist": "ie 11"

@lucidNTR
Copy link

lucidNTR commented Apr 9, 2021

I now have also specifically heard this as a reason some companies consider svelte experimental and not ready for wider adoption. the matrix does not even have to be huge, just to have one at all communicates reliability and production readiness.

@pngwn pngwn added the popular more than 20 upthumbs label Jun 26, 2021
@yringler
Copy link

This is a big deal. I think svelte would be perfect for a requirement at work, but I can't recommend it without an official browser support list.
I'm sure I'm not the only one.
Here's to having an excuse to learn svelte soon! 🍻

@kaisermann
Copy link
Member

but I can't recommend it without an official browser support list.

While it doesn't have an official browser list, via babel and/or polyfills you can pretty much support all the way back to IE 11 and similars.

@mcmxcdev
Copy link
Contributor

If the Svelte team decides on a browser support matrix, it would be easy to maintain compatibility with the use of
https://github.com/amilajack/eslint-plugin-compat

@bluwy
Copy link
Member

bluwy commented Nov 13, 2021

If a browser support list is all that's needed to resolve this, I think a quick audit in https://github.com/sveltejs/svelte/tree/master/src/runtime would cover most cases. If anyone likes to do so, we could start with a community-supported list and work from there until it's officially endorsed.

@lucavenir
Copy link

Any news on this? I do feel like just knowing the support audit is more than enough. It's crucial to have a quick table ("Yes, supported" / "No, unsupported") to let Clients know what it'll be like when their site is up and running.

Something like this, for instance.

@MentalGear
Copy link

MentalGear commented Mar 13, 2022

A browser support table is essential for assessing svelte-kit's eligibility for commercial projects.

@giratikanon
Copy link

Just wanted to +1 a simple browser support table or list. There have been more browser compatibility issues with Svelte for our users than I would have expected.

@samal-rasmussen
Copy link

samal-rasmussen commented Jun 6, 2023

I was trying to get a statically rendered sveltekit site to run on an old Chrome 58, and run into it being unable to handle these dynamic imports that sveltekit uses in index.html:
https://github.com/sveltejs/kit/blob/18b0599015f32e6c829eb005eab960a999cf8c6c/packages/kit/src/runtime/server/page/render.js#L359

Caniuse.com says dynamic import is supported from Chrome 63, Safari 11.1 and Firefox 67. So anything older than this is definitely not supported by Sveltekit:
https://caniuse.com/es6-module-dynamic-import

I tried a slightly less old Chrome 69 and this time got an error about globalThis not being defined, which I believe comes from here:
https://github.com/sveltejs/kit/blob/18b0599015f32e6c829eb005eab960a999cf8c6c/packages/kit/src/exports/vite/index.js#L347

There was no globalThis until Chrome 71:
https://caniuse.com/?search=globalThis

Putting <script>globalThis = window</script> into the head of the app.html file fixed this.

EDIT: Also I now realize this is not the sveltekit repo...

@steve-taylor
Copy link

Svelte really shines in the embedded space, where browsers are quite underpowered and React's virtual DOM overhead would have a very noticeable impact on performance. I haven't tested these, but my wish list for more exotic supported web runtimes would be

  • Samsung/LG/Hisense 2017+ smart TVs
  • PS4/5 (WebMAF 3+ - based on WebKit)
  • Xbox 3rd and 4th generation (web runtime based on legacy Edge 18, despite system browser being Edgeium)

@FeldrinH
Copy link

FeldrinH commented Nov 6, 2023

Is there any plans to work on documenting browser support? Are there any community-maintained resources about this? The lack of info on Svelte and SvelteKit browser compatibility and required polyfills is frankly very concerning and discouraging when evaluating Svelte for any commercial use.

@hyunbinseo
Copy link
Contributor

The lack of info on Svelte and SvelteKit browser compatibility and required polyfills is frankly very concerning and discouraging when evaluating Svelte for any commercial use.


SvelteKit 2 states that ES2022 is required.

SvelteKit 2 uses ES2022 features, which are supported in all modern browsers.

https://kit.svelte.dev/docs/migrating-to-sveltekit-2#updated-dependency-requirements


These are evergreen browsers that support all ES2022 features.

Browser Release Date Release Note
Chrome 94+ 2021-09-21 Link
Edge 94+ 2021-09-24 Link
Firefox 93+ 2021-10-05 Link
Safari 16.4+ 2023-03-27 Link
Samsung Internet 17.0+ 2022-05-06 Link

https://caniuse.com/?search=es2022

@FeldrinH
Copy link

SvelteKit 2 states that ES2022 is required.

SvelteKit 2 uses ES2022 features, which are supported in all modern browsers.

https://kit.svelte.dev/docs/migrating-to-sveltekit-2#updated-dependency-requirements

These are evergreen browsers that support all ES2022 features.

Browser Release Date Release Note
Chrome 94+ 2021-09-21 Link
Edge 94+ 2021-09-24 Link
Firefox 93+ 2021-10-05 Link
Safari 16.4+ 2023-03-27 Link
Samsung Internet 17.0+ 2022-05-06 Link
https://caniuse.com/?search=es2022

This is useful info, but kind of discouraging in and of itself. The ES2022 requirement seems quite restrictive, since according to caniuse, about 1/4 of Safari versions by current usage don't support all ES2022 features. This makes it much more difficult to get good browser compatibility and good bundle size with SvelteKit.

Also, ES2022 as far as I know does not include Web API-s, so there's still the question of what Web API-s need to be polyfilled for good compatibility.

@MentalGear
Copy link

MentalGear commented Feb 8, 2024

Attention: this seems to have been deleted from the official page and seems no longer true:

(not present anymore!) SvelteKit 2 uses ES2022 features, which are supported in all modern browsers.

https://kit.svelte.dev/docs/migrating-to-sveltekit-2#updated-dependency-requirements

I guess there's still no official support table for svelte either. Would be great at least to have for svelte 5. :)

Edit
Just searched the main branch (svelte 5 's source), and since it uses Map in runtime functions like packages/svelte/src/internal/client/runtime.js it seems safe to assume that the minimum is ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) that introduced Map and Set.
Github seems to index only the main branch for search operations, so if you want to know support for svelte 4 you would need to clone that branch (or open it in the web IDE) and start a full search for the properties you are interested in.

@hyunbinseo
Copy link
Contributor

For additional context, the following sentence was removed in:

- SvelteKit 2 uses ES2022 features, which are supported in all modern browsers.

This is possible because top-level-await is no longer used.

sveltejs/kit#11688 (review)

To enforce a specific build target, set it in the vite.config.ts file.

sveltejs/kit#11658 (comment)

SvelteKit v1 used the Vite default value which is close to ES2020.

sveltejs/kit#11658 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation popular more than 20 upthumbs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.