Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add
filterSerializedResponseHeaders
function #6569Add
filterSerializedResponseHeaders
function #6569Changes from 3 commits
24ae336
ad0d1bd
c86e238
92c744b
54fae62
7ecf4b9
1ed028a
643f664
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we not automatically whitelisting any headers anymore? I remember in some version of this proposal, we would automatically include
content-type
. That's gone?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was whitelisted because some tests expected it, but that seems like a bad reason to keep it. Things like
response.json()
work the same way with or withoutcontent-type
, so the only time you'd actually need it is if you're explicitly reading that header.I did wonder about filtering the headers during SSR so that you'd get a 'btw you need to include this header' error
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(though now that I think about it i have no idea if it's possible to monkey-patch
response.headers
like that)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the monkey has been patched