Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(draft): update silver fleece #157

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

manuel3108
Copy link
Member

Closes #95

Draft, because this breaks our check command, as mentioned in evertheylen/silver-fleece#3.
We can always wrap that in a @ts-ignore if no new version is released in the next day or two.

Can confirm this fixes the excessive new lines that we experienced in the paraglide integration

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 69f8b9e

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Open in Stackblitz

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/sveltejs/cli/sv@157

commit: 69f8b9e

Copy link
Member

@AdrianGonz97 AdrianGonz97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is awesome! yea, adding a @ts-ignore for now should suffice

@manuel3108 manuel3108 merged commit 5aecf2d into main Oct 16, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@manuel3108 manuel3108 deleted the chore/update-silver-fleece branch October 16, 2024 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

use different json serializer
2 participants