Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Artifacts from URIs and stack refactorings #1586

Conversation

blythed
Copy link
Collaborator

@blythed blythed commented Dec 21, 2023

Add function to extract a stack from a JSON, YAML or dictionary.

In order to make this possible, we need a broader conception of serializer which I provided in a refactoring
of the Serializer class. This required moving around some arguments.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 21, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (34830a7) 80.33% compared to head (58cc998) 80.53%.
Report is 1328 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1586      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.33%   80.53%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files          95      111      +16     
  Lines        6602     7884    +1282     
==========================================
+ Hits         5304     6349    +1045     
- Misses       1298     1535     +237     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@blythed blythed force-pushed the feature/artifacts-from-imports-and-uris branch 4 times, most recently from 5714bea to 3050fc8 Compare December 21, 2023 12:24
@blythed blythed force-pushed the feature/artifacts-from-imports-and-uris branch from 3050fc8 to 58cc998 Compare December 21, 2023 12:24
@fazlulkarimweb fazlulkarimweb merged commit 34c9ab8 into superduper-io:main Dec 21, 2023
2 checks passed
@blythed blythed deleted the feature/artifacts-from-imports-and-uris branch June 1, 2024 10:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants