chore: add missing 'is_anonymous' property to User type #871
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kangmingtay
approved these changes
Apr 2, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dave-irvine thanks for catching this, it will always be returned but lets make it optional since we need to account for users on an older version of supabase auth that don't support anonymous sign-ins
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Types update
What is the current behavior?
User type is missing 'is_anonymous' property.
What is the new behavior?
User type has the 'is_anonymous' property.
Additional context
I'm not 100% certain if this property is optional or not, hoping @kangmingtay can offer some insight as they implemented the feature in supabase/auth#68
Fixes #872