Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Fabfile #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jatindhankhar
Copy link

This commits intends to fix the old fabfile which is used to automate
installation part. Changes done
1.) local() was removed with os.system() , since utlimately it is used
to invoke shell commands and couldn't find any function/module named in
python which does that
2.) Change upstream of downloading sphinx. At the time of writing
version 0.9.9 is more than 2 years old and have archived.

Affects bin/fabfile.py

I am also thinking out to verify build process by running automated tests post commit on Github using something like Travis CI (or another CI system as long as it works) ?

This commits intends to fix the old fabfile which is used to automate
installation part. Changes done
1.) local() was removed with os.system() , since utlimately it is used
to invoke shell commands and couldn't find any function/module named in
python which does that
2.) Change upstream of downloading sphinx. At the time of writing
version 0.9.9 is more than 2 years old and have archived.

Affects bin/fabfile.py
@quozl
Copy link
Contributor

quozl commented Mar 30, 2017

Reviewed. Can't see how it ever worked, as local was not defined. Don't think build process needs CI.

@jatindhankhar
Copy link
Author

So I guess it's ready to be merged?

@quozl
Copy link
Contributor

quozl commented Mar 30, 2017

Needs a maintainer to merge. I'm just an interested party.

@iamutkarshtiwari
Copy link
Contributor

@samswag Could you please test this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants