Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated backport of #1267: Output init containers in subctl gather #1268

Conversation

tpantelis
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of #1267 on release-0.19.

#1267: Output init containers in subctl gather

For details on the backport process, see the backport requests page.

Refactored "gatherPodLogs" to take the desired container names. If none
specified, gather logs for all init and normal containers confgiured in
the pod.

Also, if a pod fails, it's useful to see the pod details so gather the
YAML for pod resources for daemonsets and deployments.

Signed-off-by: Tom Pantelis <[email protected]>
@submariner-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 Created branch: z_pr1268/tpantelis/automated-backport-of-#1267-upstream-release-0.19
🚀 Full E2E won't run until the "ready-to-test" label is applied. I will add it automatically once the PR has 2 approvals, or you can add it manually.

@tpantelis tpantelis added the ready-to-test When a PR is ready for full E2E testing label Nov 25, 2024
@tpantelis tpantelis enabled auto-merge (rebase) November 25, 2024 14:20
@tpantelis tpantelis merged commit 233c75b into submariner-io:release-0.19 Nov 26, 2024
36 checks passed
@submariner-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 Closed branches: [z_pr1268/tpantelis/automated-backport-of-#1267-upstream-release-0.19]

tpantelis added a commit to tpantelis/subctl that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
@tpantelis tpantelis deleted the automated-backport-of-#1267-upstream-release-0.19 branch December 11, 2024 12:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automated-backport backport-handled ready-to-test When a PR is ready for full E2E testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants