-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(docs): upgrade dependencies #1391
Conversation
Upgraded Next.js to 15.0.0 and React to 19.0.0-rc-65a56d0e-20241020. Updated packages in pnpm-lock.yaml to match new versions.
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to three files: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/package.json (1)
10-10
: Consider documenting upgrade stepsMajor version upgrades of both Next.js and React may require migration steps. Consider adding upgrade notes to the documentation.
Would you like me to help create a migration guide or update the documentation with the necessary steps?
Also applies to: 13-14
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docs/pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- docs/next-env.d.ts (1 hunks)
- docs/package.json (1 hunks)
- docs/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docs/next-env.d.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/package.json (2)
10-10
: Verify Next.js 15 compatibility with nextraThe upgrade to Next.js 15.0.0 is a major version change. Please ensure compatibility with nextra (2.13.1) and nextra-theme-docs (2.13.1).
13-14
:⚠️ Potential issueCaution: Using React 19 Release Candidate in production
Using a release candidate version of React (19.0.0-rc) in a production documentation site carries risks:
- RC versions may contain bugs or breaking changes
- Future RC releases might introduce incompatibilities
- Limited community support and testing
Consider using the latest stable version (18.2.0) until React 19 reaches a stable release.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the nature and usage of this documentation site.
This will help us understand:
- The structure and complexity of the documentation site
- Build/deployment scripts that indicate production usage
- Dependencies and their relationships
Based on the results, I can now provide a final response as we have enough context about the documentation site's nature and setup.
Using React 19 RC version is acceptable for this documentation site
The concern about using React 19 RC can be relaxed because:
- This is a static documentation site built with Nextra and Next.js
- The site has minimal interactive components (mainly navigation and search)
- It's not a complex production application handling critical user data
- The setup is using Vercel's recommended stack (Next.js + Speed Insights)
- The documentation nature of the site means lower risk even if minor UI issues occur
While using RC versions in production apps is generally discouraged, for a static documentation site the benefits of testing newer React features outweigh the risks. The site's simple nature makes it a good candidate for early adoption.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if this is a documentation-only site or if it's used in production rg -l "getStaticProps|getServerSideProps|getInitialProps" docs/Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for Next.js configuration and page structure fd . docs/ -e js -e jsx -e ts -e tsx -e mdx --exec head -n 20 {} # Also check package.json to understand the build and deployment setup cat docs/package.jsonLength of output: 5079
docs/tsconfig.json (2)
19-20
: LGTM! The ES2017 target is appropriate for Next.js 15.The addition of
"target": "ES2017"
aligns well with Next.js 15's requirements and provides a good balance between modern JavaScript features and browser compatibility.
20-20
: Verify browser compatibility requirements.ES2017 is well-supported by modern browsers but drops support for IE11. Please ensure this aligns with your documentation site's browser compatibility requirements.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try to gather more information about browser compatibility requirements by searching through the entire codebase.
Let me check the content of the markdown file that was found to see if it contains any relevant browser compatibility information.
Based on the investigation of the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
ES2017 target is appropriate for this documentation site
The codebase appears to be a modern documentation site built with Next.js and Nextra. Looking at the dependencies in the docs directory:
- Using Next.js 15.0.0
- Using React 19.0.0 RC
- Modern development dependencies
These dependencies already require modern browsers, and there's no indication of IE11 support requirements in any configuration files or documentation. The ES2017 target is actually a conservative choice that aligns well with the modern tech stack being used.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any browser compatibility specifications in package.json or README rg -l "browserslist|browsers|compatibility" README.md package.jsonLength of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for browser compatibility related configurations in common config files fd -e json -e js -e yaml -e yml -x rg -l "browserslist|browsers|compatibility|browserSupport" # Search specifically for IE11 mentions which might indicate browser support requirements rg -i "ie11|internet explorer" # Look for any documentation about supported browsers fd -e md -x rg -l "browser|compatibility"Length of output: 209
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of the found markdown file cat ./docs/pages/docs/walkthrough/raw.md # Let's also check the docs directory for any configuration files that might indicate the target environment fd -e json -e js . docs/ -x cat {}Length of output: 6144
Upgraded Next.js to 15.0.0 and React to 19.0.0-rc-65a56d0e-20241020. Updated packages in pnpm-lock.yaml to match new versions.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Dependencies
next
package to version15.0.0
.react
andreact-dom
to version19.0.0-rc-65a56d0e-20241020
.Documentation
Configuration
ES2017
in TypeScript configuration.