Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate product_uri and reflectance_conversion_factor #2 #17

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

m-mohr
Copy link
Contributor

@m-mohr m-mohr commented May 29, 2024

This is likely more controversial than the other deprecated fields, but in discussions with ESA around their official STAC catalog (CDSE) for Sentinel-2, it was decided to not deliver these two fields in the official STAC catalog in the future. Thus I'd say we could also deprecate it here.

@m-mohr m-mohr requested review from philvarner and gadomski May 29, 2024 12:17
@@ -726,7 +725,6 @@
"s2:not_vegetated_percentage": 0.000708,
"s2:degraded_msi_data_percentage": 0,
"s2:high_proba_clouds_percentage": 0.699942,
"s2:reflectance_conversion_factor": 1.01678413954947,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a different key that we should be using for this value? Feels strange to lose information and not just move it to a different key.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, ESA removes it without replacement. It seems not relevant to the general public.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤔 strange — it's documented in https://sentinels.copernicus.eu/documents/247904/0/Sentinel-2-product-specifications-document-V14-9.pdf so seems unusual to want to remove it. I guess I'm -0.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's what ESA came up with in recent calls. We should probably wait for the official release of the CDSE STAC API anyway before we merge this.

@m-mohr m-mohr marked this pull request as draft May 29, 2024 18:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants