Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add unit tests for SqAccordionComponent #81

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dyelmag
Copy link
Contributor

@dyelmag dyelmag commented Aug 28, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced a comprehensive test suite for the SqAccordionComponent to validate its functionality and behavior.
    • Added tests for the openFirst property, ensuring the first collapse opens automatically when true.
    • Verified correct handling of the onlyOne property to manage collapse behavior.
    • Ensured proper subscription management to prevent memory leaks during component destruction.

@dyelmag dyelmag self-assigned this Aug 28, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 28, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a comprehensive test suite for the SqAccordionComponent, ensuring its functionality is thoroughly validated. The tests cover initialization, behavior based on properties like openFirst and onlyOne, user interactions, and proper cleanup on destruction, enhancing the reliability of the component.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/components/sq-accordion/sq-accordion.component.spec.ts Added a test suite for SqAccordionComponent validating initialization, property behavior, and user interactions.

Poem

In the land of code where components play,
Tests now guard the SqAccordion way.
With properties checked and interactions bright,
Reliability shines, making everything right!
So let’s celebrate with a cheer and a song,
For testing brings strength, and we all belong! 🎉


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/sq-accordion/sq-accordion.component.spec.ts (1)

1-5: Ensure consistent import order.

Consider organizing imports by grouping Angular core imports together and component imports together. This improves readability and maintainability.

-import { SqAccordionComponent } from './sq-accordion.component'
-import { SqCollapseComponent } from './sq-collapse/sq-collapse.component'
-import { EventEmitter, QueryList } from '@angular/core'
+import { EventEmitter, QueryList } from '@angular/core'
+import { SqAccordionComponent } from './sq-accordion.component'
+import { SqCollapseComponent } from './sq-collapse/sq-collapse.component'
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9fc5ea and 18d3212.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/sq-accordion/sq-accordion.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (12)
src/components/sq-accordion/sq-accordion.component.spec.ts (12)

6-9: Good setup for component and fixture.

The setup for the component and fixture is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


16-18: Good initialization of fixture and component instance.

The initialization of the fixture and component instance is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


19-23: Good use of jasmine spy object for mockCollapse.

The use of jasmine.createSpyObj to create a mock for SqCollapseComponent is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


24-27: Good initialization of collapses QueryList.

The initialization of the collapses QueryList is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


28-29: Good use of fixture.detectChanges.

The use of fixture.detectChanges to trigger change detection is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


31-33: Good test for component creation.

The test for component creation is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


35-42: Good test for openFirst behavior.

The test for the openFirst behavior is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


44-51: Good test for event subscription.

The test for subscribing to the openedEmitter event is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


53-67: Good test for onlyOne behavior.

The test for the onlyOne behavior is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


69-85: Good test for not closing other collapses when onlyOne is false.

The test for ensuring other collapses are not closed when onlyOne is false is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


87-94: Good test for cleanup on destroy.

The test for unsubscribing from all collapses on destroy is correctly implemented.

The code changes are approved.


11-15: Ensure async/await usage is necessary.

The async keyword is used with beforeEach. Ensure that the compileComponents method requires await. If not, consider removing async for simplicity.

Verify if await is necessary for compileComponents:

Verification successful

The use of async/await with compileComponents is necessary. In Angular, compileComponents is an asynchronous method that returns a promise, ensuring that components are fully compiled before tests proceed. This usage contributes to the reliability and correctness of the tests. No changes are needed here.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if `await` is necessary for `compileComponents`.

# Test: Search for `compileComponents` usage in the codebase. Expect: Only occurrences where `await` is necessary.
rg --type ts 'compileComponents'

Length of output: 118


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check where `compileComponents` is defined or imported to confirm its asynchronous nature.
rg --type ts 'compileComponents' -A 5

Length of output: 607

@dyelmag dyelmag requested a review from evertondsantos August 29, 2024 17:12
@dyelmag
Copy link
Contributor Author

dyelmag commented Aug 29, 2024

@JonasPeres code review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants