Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gracefully handle parse failure with locking #4114

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

JakeWharton
Copy link
Collaborator

Before we would poison the map with the lock object so the second caller would get a weird ClassCastException.

Closes #4113


  • CHANGELOG.md's "Unreleased" section has been updated, if applicable.

Before we would poison the map with the lock object so the second caller would get a weird ClassCastException.
@JakeWharton JakeWharton requested a review from swankjesse March 22, 2024 14:15
Comment on lines +236 to +240
} catch (Throwable e) {
// Remove the lock on failure. Any other locked threads will retry as a result.
serviceMethodCache.remove(method);
throw e;
}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change is here

Comment on lines +256 to +259
if (result == null) {
// The other thread failed its parsing. We will retry (and probably also fail).
continue;
}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And here (plus the enclosing while (true))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am thinking about whether this situation is possible: thread 1 put its lock1to the cache, granted the right to parse the method, but failed and threw an exception. Then, thread 2, which was waiting for thread 1 to parse the method, synchronize lock1 successfully, find the result is null, continue the while loop and put its lock2 to the cache. Then, Thread 3 synchronize lock1. However, the result retrieved from the cache by thread 3 is lock2 instead of null. Thus, thread 3 try to cast object to ServiceMethod and a ClassCastException happens. Can we check result instanceof ServiceMethod<?> here? What's more, can we check lookup instanceof ServiceMethod<?> before synchronize lookup to eliminate the pointless lock and redundant lookup you've metioned in comment(line 253)? Thanks.

@JakeWharton JakeWharton merged commit c579693 into trunk Mar 27, 2024
7 checks passed
@JakeWharton JakeWharton deleted the jw.locks.2024-03-22 branch March 27, 2024 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Object cannot be cast to class retrofit2.ServiceMethod
3 participants