Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrected errors on the ACLS document. #12280

Conversation

Wilson-Emmanuel
Copy link
Contributor

@Wilson-Emmanuel Wilson-Emmanuel commented Nov 24, 2022

Base on the recommendation from the issue I created few days ago. I have created a PR to submit the edits I made on the ACLs document.

I used the unmerged edit from 5.8.x and also the ACL SQL Schema as a guide to effect the corrections.

@pivotal-cla
Copy link

@Wilson-Emmanuel Please sign the Contributor License Agreement!

Click here to manually synchronize the status of this Pull Request.

See the FAQ for frequently asked questions.

@pivotal-cla
Copy link

@Wilson-Emmanuel Thank you for signing the Contributor License Agreement!

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Nov 24, 2022
sjohnr added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2022
Apply editing changes from gh-9668
@sjohnr
Copy link
Member

sjohnr commented Dec 15, 2022

Merged via edd1915 and polished via ed657a8 to include edits from gh-9668.

@sjohnr sjohnr closed this Dec 15, 2022
@sjohnr sjohnr added status: duplicate A duplicate of another issue in: docs An issue in Documentation or samples type: bug A general bug and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Dec 15, 2022
@sjohnr sjohnr added this to the 6.0.1 milestone Dec 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: docs An issue in Documentation or samples status: duplicate A duplicate of another issue type: bug A general bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants