Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consistent simple value type check (including UUID treatment for data binding) #30664

Closed
jhoeller opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Consistent simple value type check (including UUID treatment for data binding) #30664

jhoeller opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@jhoeller
Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) type: enhancement A general enhancement
Milestone
6.1.0-M1

Comments

@jhoeller
Copy link
Contributor

Following up on #30286 and #30661, there are two deviating isSimpleValueType checks in the codebase now that should get unified for 6.1. This includes UUID treatment as simple value type for BeanUtils purposes as well which shines through to web data binding etc.
@jhoeller jhoeller added in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: enhancement A general enhancement labels Jun 14, 2023
@jhoeller jhoeller added this to the 6.1.0-M1 milestone Jun 14, 2023
@jhoeller jhoeller self-assigned this Jun 14, 2023
jhoeller added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 14, 2023
@jhoeller
Javadoc notes on isSimpleValueType in BeanUtils vs ClassUtils
3de4e93 
See gh-30664
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jhoeller jhoeller

Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) in: web Issues in web modules (web, webmvc, webflux, websocket) type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
6.1.0-M1
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jhoeller