Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refer to ActiveMQ as ActiveMQ "Classic" #37606

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jbertram
Copy link
Contributor

The Apache ActiveMQ project has adopted the label "Classic" for the 5.x broker in order to more easily compare and contrast it with the broker code-named Artemis.

The Spring docs should do the same to clarify ActiveMQ broker usage and configuration.

The Apache ActiveMQ project has adopted the label "Classic" for the 5.x
broker in order to more easily compare and contrast it with the broker
code-named Artemis.

The Spring docs should do the same to clarify ActiveMQ broker usage and
configuration.
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Sep 27, 2023
@wilkinsona wilkinsona changed the title Clarify ActiveMQ usage in JMS docs Refer to ActiveMQ as ActiveMQ "Classic" Sep 27, 2023
@wilkinsona wilkinsona added type: documentation A documentation update and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Sep 27, 2023
@wilkinsona wilkinsona added this to the 2.7.x milestone Sep 27, 2023
@mhalbritter mhalbritter self-assigned this Sep 28, 2023
@mhalbritter
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you!

@mhalbritter mhalbritter modified the milestones: 2.7.x, 2.7.17 Sep 28, 2023
mhalbritter added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2023
The Apache ActiveMQ project has adopted the label "Classic" for the 5.x
broker in order to more easily compare and contrast it with the broker
code-named Artemis.

See gh-37606
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: documentation A documentation update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants