Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[easy] Test for Codebook.to_json / open_json #1645

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2019

Conversation

ttung
Copy link
Collaborator

@ttung ttung commented Nov 9, 2019

This verifies that the two operations are symmetric.

Test plan: this is the test.

@ttung ttung requested a review from shanaxel42 November 9, 2019 03:27
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 9, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1645 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #1645      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   90.09%   90.1%   +0.01%     
=========================================
  Files         234     235       +1     
  Lines        8764    8775      +11     
=========================================
+ Hits         7896    7907      +11     
  Misses        868     868
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
starfish/core/codebook/test/test_to_json.py 100% <100%> (ø)
starfish/core/codebook/codebook.py 96.79% <100%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6674d9b...f5218ec. Read the comment docs.

This verifies that the two operations are symmetric.

Test plan: this is the test.
@ttung ttung force-pushed the tonytung-codebook-to-json-test branch from f5218ec to eaf77da Compare November 13, 2019 06:38
@ttung ttung merged commit 3072f3c into master Nov 13, 2019
@ttung ttung deleted the tonytung-codebook-to-json-test branch November 13, 2019 17:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants