Rcal-298: Set Up Testing Infrastructure

[PaulHuwe]

This ticket sets up the GitHub actions for RomanISim. The actions are a straight port of the ones form RomanCAL. In addition, I modified the code to pass all the checks (sans test coverage - that will be delineated in other tickets).

[PaulHuwe]

I left significant code changes I made in comments, which I can clean up before transition from draft PR to full PR. Please let me know if you guys see anything that should be changed, tests that should be excised, etc.

[schlafly]

This all looks good to me. I added a comment about one change I worry will break things, where I intentionally suppresed some exceptions when converting some metadata between the kinds than CRDS accepts and the kinds in the image model metadata. I'm sure there's a better way to handle the metadata passing, but I don't want to break the current hack-y functionality with this PR. You can go ahead and delete all the commented code as far as I can tell.

[ddavis-stsci]

Overall LGTM

[PaulHuwe]

@zacharyburnett @WilliamJamieson The codecoverage report is still not working in the environment, though the commands run locally. Any ideas why that would be?

[zacharyburnett]

@zacharyburnett @WilliamJamieson The codecoverage report is still not working in the environment, though the commands run locally. Any ideas why that would be?

@PaulHuwe I tested removing --pyargs and adding a term-missing report to the output, it seems to work. I made a change suggestion above. I'm not sure why it's not finding reportable data in the CI but hopefully this fixes it

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@05f83ad). Click here to learn what that means.
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #14   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage        ?   0.88%           
======================================
  Files           ?      12           
  Lines           ?     792           
  Branches        ?       0           
======================================
  Hits            ?       7           
  Misses          ?     785           
  Partials        ?       0           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	0.88% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[nden]

🚀