-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Move relation field properties onto collection #2529
Merged
AndrewSisley
merged 11 commits into
sourcenetwork:develop
from
AndrewSisley:2451-mv-sec-rel-fields
Apr 19, 2024
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
32d9cec
Extract parsing of FieldKind to private func
AndrewSisley 819c1cc
Remove duplicate error message
AndrewSisley f917253
Resolve sec. mapping using ColDef
AndrewSisley bfbfc6d
Rename tryGetFieldID
AndrewSisley 0cfaaf4
Determine relationshipness in mapper from Kind
AndrewSisley f168c1c
Move relation field properties onto collection
AndrewSisley 76077b1
FIXUP - Fix schema version id tests
AndrewSisley 042c19a
Document breaking change
AndrewSisley d3a3371
PR FIXUP - Use field definitions generating gql inputs
AndrewSisley 9c4fe72
PR FIXUP - Expand documentation on local vs global fields
AndrewSisley 137e943
PR FIXUP - Fix typo in code comment
AndrewSisley File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
question: Can you explain how this will ever be the case? Even the embedded object doesn't seem to make sense to me here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have this at the moment, e.g. related objects within a view (declared with
interface
instead oftype
in an SDL).Embedded objects do not have 'stuff' declared on a collection description, they are schema-only.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(discussed in a call)
todo: The documentation for local-only vs local-global vs global-only fields is insufficient and dispersed. I will add more public documentation to the relevant
client
types/props.