Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set mica agasc calls to use miniagasc* #285

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 4, 2023
Merged

Set mica agasc calls to use miniagasc* #285

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 4, 2023

Conversation

jeanconn
Copy link
Contributor

@jeanconn jeanconn commented Oct 4, 2023

Description

Set mica agasc calls to use miniagasc*

This is in response to sot/agasc#155 which changes the default agasc file to the most recent proseco agasc. Overall that makes sense for operations, but bits of the mica code expect columns that aren't present in the proseco agasc. It would probably be useful to update mica to just not use those columns (even for display) but for now I think it makes sense to update the calls in mica to use the miniagasc. And this may end up being somewhat application specific in mica so I didn't set up any configuration for it.

mica tests don't pass with sot/agasc#155

Interface impacts

Testing

Tested against a ska3-masters environment with sot/agasc#155 .

Unit tests

  • Linux

Independent check of unit tests by [REVIEWER NAME]

  • [PLATFORM]:

Functional tests

No functional testing.

@jeanconn jeanconn requested a review from taldcroft October 4, 2023 15:29
@jeanconn jeanconn mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2023
24 tasks
@jeanconn
Copy link
Contributor Author

jeanconn commented Oct 4, 2023

Retested after 9eb3930

Copy link
Member

@taldcroft taldcroft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jeanconn jeanconn merged commit db6a0ff into master Oct 4, 2023
@jeanconn jeanconn deleted the agasc-default branch October 4, 2023 16:48
This was referenced Oct 4, 2023
@javierggt javierggt mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants