You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Align 5GTANGO's terminology to ETSI terminology as far as possible (e.g., rename/restructure fields).
Identify gaps between the two information models.
Aim for high standardization impact.
This probably requires quite some effort, to check all relevant ETSI documentation and compare it with ours. Any help is appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
during today's OSM call, people mentioned an upcoming ETSI document “SOL006: Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) Release 2; Protocols and Data Models; NFV Descriptors based on YANG Specification YANG based NFV Descriptors spec “
Seems ETSI is finally working on an implementation of their data models using YANG. This is relevant for us. We should track this and maybe compare to our data models once they release the document. In the best case we can align our models to them.
Does anybody have more infos about the draft? Or the draft document as such?
stefanbschneider
changed the title
Mapping & alignment with ETSI NFV descriptors
Alignment with new ETSI NFV descriptors in YANG format (SOL006)
Sep 20, 2018
SOL006 has been submitted to NFV TSC for final approval. The final version of the GS is going to be available once it has been published. The correct location to access the latest YANG files can be found here.
Align 5GTANGO's terminology to ETSI terminology as far as possible (e.g., rename/restructure fields).
Identify gaps between the two information models.
Aim for high standardization impact.
This probably requires quite some effort, to check all relevant ETSI documentation and compare it with ours. Any help is appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: