Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added the client point of view on UC3 #239

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 21, 2021

Conversation

bblfish
Copy link
Contributor

@bblfish bblfish commented Jul 14, 2021

No description provided.

Todo: what is the ACR for
`</weekly-status/2021-04-28/report.md>` and what information is in it?
An unauthenticated client making a GET on `</weekly-status/>` container will receive a `Link: <.acp>; rel="acl"` header in the `401` response that points to the above `<.acp>`.
This relation is what makes the contents of `</weekly-status/.acp>` authoritative, and is therefore the information the client can use to decide what credentials to present.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this assumption can be made only in very limited number of real world scenarios. I don't see why we would want to make this assumption for this use case.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What assumption do you have a problem with @elf-pavlik?
I am building my server this way and that is how I built clients in the past.

@bblfish bblfish merged commit d853020 into solid:uc3-inheritance Jul 21, 2021
@bblfish
Copy link
Contributor Author

bblfish commented Jul 21, 2021

Oops, I mistakenly merged this by pushing to the wrong branch on the command line.
I could unmerge but that looks like it will be messy: it opens a new PR, and so looses the thread of conversation here. So if we need to unmerge we can do that as a PR later.
Luckily this was not merged to the main branch.

@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member

No worries we can still catch issues on the PR targeted by this one. I just moved my comment to #216 (review)

@matthieubosquet
Copy link
Member

I agree with @elf-pavlik, no worries Henry.

@bblfish bblfish deleted the uc3-inheritance branch July 21, 2021 17:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants