Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

Checkpointing implementation #2793

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

aeyakovenko
Copy link
Member

Problem

This implements bank checkpointing and forking. But current code base does not synchronize well between tpu/tvu transitions and leader schedule updates. So creating a fork inside replay_stage wont work.

Summary of Changes

Implements checkpointing, and factors out all the checkpoint and state management out of the bank.
Fixes #

Copy link
Contributor

@garious garious left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Too soon my man. BankDelta is awesome optimization that I'm going to want, but don't make that switch just yet.

@aeyakovenko
Copy link
Member Author

aeyakovenko commented Feb 16, 2019

Too soon my man. BankDelta is awesome optimization that I'm going to want, but don't make that switch just yet.

I would actually rather not use BankDelta. I think the final form should be based on persistent accounts #2769.

@aeyakovenko aeyakovenko reopened this Feb 17, 2019
@aeyakovenko
Copy link
Member Author

#2799 gets us really close to the functionality of this PR, minus the forking logic. The forking logic can be refactored into master separately

tag: @garious @sakridge @carllin

lijunwangs pushed a commit to lijunwangs/solana that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2024
wen-coding pushed a commit to wen-coding/solana that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants