Add RejectContext to RejectHandler. #3285
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@adamw could you please take a look? I tried to align logic in case of reject interceptor handlers to other default interceptors handlers |
Grryum
changed the title
kciesielski
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Sometimes, in order to form the body of the response in the case of 404 Not Found, it is necessary to use data from the request (for example headers: requestId, cookie etc). It is impossible to do this without implementing your custom RejectInterceptor.
Implementing custom reject interceptor and prepending it to CustomiseInterceptors brake standard interceptor order and may lead to unwanted behavior.