Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Audit Functionality #7580

Closed
wants to merge 25 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

jacobsen9026
Copy link

These are my commits to improve the under construction update location checkbox and adding a setting to always checkout on audit if the asset is not assigned to a user already.

Only update location if asset is not checked out already.
Only update location on audit if asset is not already checked out.
Save checkout on audit setting when saving. Default value 0.

The database needs the checkout_on_audit column added to the Settings table during install. I am unsure how.
Add Checkout on Audit option to general settings page
English lang reference, other languages would need translation.
Added check to checkout if asset is unassigned
Add check from settings to checkout on audit if item is checked out to location or is not checked out at all.
@jacobsen9026 jacobsen9026 reopened this Nov 8, 2019
Fix for checking out of assets that are already checked out to audited location
Fix for checking out of assets that are already checked out to audited location
@jacobsen9026
Copy link
Author

This functionality requires a new column in the Settings table called checkout_on_audit.

I am unaware of how to accomplish this on install.

Fix for can't save when require accept signature not checked.

snipe#7437
Add routes for bulk checkin page
This does not work yet.  For issue snipe#6057
Change button label to checkin
Add functionality for bulk checkin

For issue snipe#6057
Removed functions that were placed in wrong file, moved to Assets/BulkAssetsController.php
@jacobsen9026 jacobsen9026 mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2019
2 tasks
@memtech3
Copy link

@jacobsen9026 check out the failed checks above it might help speed up the integration of this feature. Unfortunately I am not capable of fixing the above issues

@snipe
Copy link
Owner

snipe commented Mar 30, 2021

Hey there! I’m so very sorry to have taken a hundred years to get this this, but I think this - mostly - looks okay. Can you handle the merge conflict maybe? I’m not exactly sure I understand the use case for this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants