Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Codegenerate Python application example and add explicit cast during JSON deserialization #1520
Codegenerate Python application example and add explicit cast during JSON deserialization #1520
Changes from 6 commits
0f9257a
1fbaf2d
05f947c
411d4d1
c008a0c
b1a8475
90958c7
d6f8dc8
468bdfd
92e79f2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How this is written now assumes the conversion will always be a
.something()
suffix, which may not always be the case. I think this would be a lot more flexible if it took a String or Writable as an argument that represents the value/expression being converted, and then places that in the correct place itself.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure I understand properly what you are suggesting here...
What do you mean with expect
.something()
to always exists?I thought that passing a shape and adding the suffix to it in case it differs from the original shape was the most general way of achieving this.
Can you expand a little on your proposal?