Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[driver] Search for compatible Android runtime directories #3

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

smeenai
Copy link
Owner

@smeenai smeenai commented Aug 31, 2023

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Android triples include a version number, which makes direct triple
comparisons for per-target runtime directory searching not always work.
Instead, look for the triple with the highest compatible version number
and use that per-target runtime directory instead. This maintains the
existing fallback to a triple without any version number, but I'm hoping
we can remove that in the future. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/62717
discusses this further.

The one remaining triple mismatch after this is that Android armv7
triples usually have an environment of androideabi, which Clang
normalizes to android. If you use the androideabi triple when
building the runtimes with a per-target runtimes dir, the directory will
get created with androideabi in its name, but Clang's triple search
uses the normalized triple and will look for an android directory
instead. https://reviews.llvm.org/D140925 will fix that by normalizing
triples when creating the per-target runtimes directories as well.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158476

Android triples include a version number, which makes direct triple
comparisons for per-target runtime directory searching not always work.
Instead, look for the triple with the highest compatible version number
and use that per-target runtime directory instead. This maintains the
existing fallback to a triple without any version number, but I'm hoping
we can remove that in the future. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/62717
discusses this further.

The one remaining triple mismatch after this is that Android armv7
triples usually have an environment of `androideabi`, which Clang
normalizes to `android`. If you use the `androideabi` triple when
building the runtimes with a per-target runtimes dir, the directory will
get created with `androideabi` in its name, but Clang's triple search
uses the normalized triple and will look for an `android` directory
instead. https://reviews.llvm.org/D140925 will fix that by normalizing
triples when creating the per-target runtimes directories as well.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158476

[ghstack-poisoned]
Android triples include a version number, which makes direct triple
comparisons for per-target runtime directory searching not always work.
Instead, look for the triple with the highest compatible version number
and use that per-target runtime directory instead. This maintains the
existing fallback to a triple without any version number, but I'm hoping
we can remove that in the future. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/62717
discusses this further.

The one remaining triple mismatch after this is that Android armv7
triples usually have an environment of `androideabi`, which Clang
normalizes to `android`. If you use the `androideabi` triple when
building the runtimes with a per-target runtimes dir, the directory will
get created with `androideabi` in its name, but Clang's triple search
uses the normalized triple and will look for an `android` directory
instead. https://reviews.llvm.org/D140925 will fix that by normalizing
triples when creating the per-target runtimes directories as well.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158476

[ghstack-poisoned]
smeenai added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2023
Android triples include a version number, which makes direct triple
comparisons for per-target runtime directory searching not always work.
Instead, look for the triple with the highest compatible version number
and use that per-target runtime directory instead. This maintains the
existing fallback to a triple without any version number, but I'm hoping
we can remove that in the future. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/62717
discusses this further.

The one remaining triple mismatch after this is that Android armv7
triples usually have an environment of `androideabi`, which Clang
normalizes to `android`. If you use the `androideabi` triple when
building the runtimes with a per-target runtimes dir, the directory will
get created with `androideabi` in its name, but Clang's triple search
uses the normalized triple and will look for an `android` directory
instead. https://reviews.llvm.org/D140925 will fix that by normalizing
triples when creating the per-target runtimes directories as well.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158476

ghstack-source-id: f9c3ddcd1f81c15fae53c265edf3280e619d2b6e
Pull Request resolved: #3
smeenai added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2023
Android triples include a version number, which makes direct triple
comparisons for per-target runtime directory searching not always work.
Instead, look for the triple with the highest compatible version number
and use that per-target runtime directory instead. This maintains the
existing fallback to a triple without any version number, but I'm hoping
we can remove that in the future. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/62717
discusses this further.

The one remaining triple mismatch after this is that Android armv7
triples usually have an environment of `androideabi`, which Clang
normalizes to `android`. If you use the `androideabi` triple when
building the runtimes with a per-target runtimes dir, the directory will
get created with `androideabi` in its name, but Clang's triple search
uses the normalized triple and will look for an `android` directory
instead. https://reviews.llvm.org/D140925 will fix that by normalizing
triples when creating the per-target runtimes directories as well.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158476

ghstack-source-id: 7829a156cc455192c02fd7b23819fa26ffbca730
Pull Request resolved: #3

commit-id:e61775a8
smeenai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
…fine.parallel verifier

This patch updates AffineParallelOp::verify() to check each result type matches
its corresponding reduction op (i.e, the result type must be a `FloatType` if
the reduction attribute is `addf`)

affine.parallel will crash on --lower-affine if the corresponding result type
cannot match the reduction attribute.

```
      %128 = affine.parallel (%arg2, %arg3) = (0, 0) to (8, 7) reduce ("maxf") -> (memref<8x7xf32>) {
        %alloc_33 = memref.alloc() : memref<8x7xf32>
        affine.yield %alloc_33 : memref<8x7xf32>
      }
```
This will crash and report a type conversion issue when we run `mlir-opt --lower-affine`

```
Assertion failed: (isa<To>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!"), function cast, file Casting.h, line 572.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0.	Program arguments: mlir-opt --lower-affine temp.mlir
 #0 0x0000000102a18f18 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f8f18)
 #1 0x0000000102a171b4 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f71b4)
 #2 0x0000000102a195c4 SignalHandler(int) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1002f95c4)
 #3 0x00000001be7894c4 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+0x1803414c4)
 #4 0x00000001be771ee0 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib+0x180329ee0)
 #5 0x00000001be6ac340 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x180264340)
 #6 0x00000001be6ab754 (/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib+0x180263754)
 #7 0x0000000106864790 mlir::arith::getIdentityValueAttr(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (.cold.4) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x104144790)
 #8 0x0000000102ba66ac mlir::arith::getIdentityValueAttr(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x1004866ac)
 #9 0x0000000102ba6910 mlir::arith::getIdentityValue(mlir::arith::AtomicRMWKind, mlir::Type, mlir::OpBuilder&, mlir::Location) (/workspacebin/mlir-opt+0x100486910)
...
```

Fixes llvm#64068

Reviewed By: mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157985
@smeenai smeenai closed this Aug 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant