Feature/issue 657, 783 - Remote Control - OnRCStatus notification

[mrapitis]

Fixes #657, #783

This PR is ready for review.

Risk

This PR makes minor API changes.

Testing Plan

Added new unit tests and expanded existing ones

Summary

Added RPC's, structs, enums as defined in the Remote Control OnRCStatus notification proposal.

CLA

• I have signed the CLA

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #709 into develop will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 42.85%.

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop     #709      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      43.43%   43.39%   -0.05%     
- Complexity      3018     3025       +7     
=============================================
  Files            380      381       +1     
  Lines          17415    17443      +28     
  Branches        1732     1734       +2     
=============================================
+ Hits            7565     7569       +4     
- Misses          9531     9557      +26     
+ Partials         319      317       -2

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...n/java/com/smartdevicelink/proxy/SdlProxyBase.java	4.75% <0%> (-0.02%)	6 <0> (ø)
...com/smartdevicelink/protocol/enums/FunctionID.java	89.89% <100%> (+0.1%)	8 <0> (ø)	⬇️
...java/com/smartdevicelink/proxy/rpc/OnRCStatus.java	64.7% <64.7%> (ø)	7 <7> (?)
...smartdevicelink/encoder/VirtualDisplayEncoder.java	24.71% <0%> (-4.6%)	8% <0%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ef10c5e...fc4233d. Read the comment docs.

[bilal-alsharifi]

@mrapitis can we add allowed parameter to OnRCStatus as described in this proposal. It is a different proposal but it will make it easier for testing if we do them in one PR.

[mrapitis]

@bilal-alsharifi we have added the allowed parameter as described in #783 Can you please re-review when time permits? Thanks!