Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BCFR-1099 sei custom log index #15858

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

dhaidashenko
Copy link
Collaborator

Added custom calculation of log's index to match LogPoller's expectations

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2025

AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

@dhaidashenko dhaidashenko marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 19:55
@dhaidashenko dhaidashenko requested review from a team as code owners January 7, 2025 19:55
if el.Method == "eth_getLogs" {
r.rpcLog.Critical("evmclient.BatchCallContext: eth_getLogs is not supported")
return errors.New("evmclient.BatchCallContext: eth_getLogs is not supported")
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this mean we can't support LogPoller / CCIP on AStar?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, nevermind... I forgot we only use batch requests with eth_getBlockByNumber. Still, very strange that AStar wouldn't support this! We have thought about changing the eth_getLogs requests to a batched request, I guess if we do that we'll have to fall back to the older method on AStar 🤔

@reductionista reductionista added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 7debe85 Jan 7, 2025
187 checks passed
@reductionista reductionista deleted the feature/BCFR-1099-sei-custom-log-index branch January 7, 2025 22:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants