Documentation for Uni.map incorrect

[edeandrea]

The documentation for the Uni.map method states This method is equivalent to {@code uni.onItem().apply(x -> ...)}. This is incorrect. It should be This method is equivalent to {@code uni.onItem().transform(x -> ...)}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #636 (6f315f2) into main (666e3a7) will increase coverage by 0.43%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 6f315f2 differs from pull request most recent head 2171185. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2171185 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #636      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     89.90%   90.33%   +0.43%     
- Complexity     3018     3034      +16     
============================================
  Files           395      395              
  Lines         11829    11829              
  Branches       1478     1480       +2     
============================================
+ Hits          10635    10686      +51     
+ Misses          618      582      -36     
+ Partials        576      561      -15     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...entation/src/main/java/io/smallrye/mutiny/Uni.java	96.66% <ø> (ø)
...ava/io/smallrye/mutiny/helpers/HalfSerializer.java	77.77% <0.00%> (-11.12%)	⬇️
...erators/multi/builders/BufferItemMultiEmitter.java	90.78% <0.00%> (-1.32%)	⬇️
...mallrye/mutiny/operators/multi/MultiFlatMapOp.java	85.66% <0.00%> (+0.93%)	⬆️
...lrye/mutiny/subscription/SerializedSubscriber.java	90.56% <0.00%> (+0.94%)	⬆️
...smallrye/mutiny/operators/multi/MultiEmitOnOp.java	90.47% <0.00%> (+0.95%)	⬆️
...mallrye/mutiny/helpers/queues/MpscLinkedQueue.java	100.00% <0.00%> (+1.61%)	⬆️
...java/io/smallrye/mutiny/helpers/Subscriptions.java	80.66% <0.00%> (+1.65%)	⬆️
...y/operators/multi/processors/UnicastProcessor.java	97.34% <0.00%> (+1.76%)	⬆️
...io/smallrye/mutiny/operators/uni/UniMemoizeOp.java	95.04% <0.00%> (+1.98%)	⬆️
... and 8 more

[edeandrea]

I'm not sure how my change impacts any code coverage. My update was only to a Javadoc comment...

[jponge]

Thanks!

Code coverage measures fluctuates for some reasons, @cescoffier and I have become used to deltas 😆