Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Using integration icons from LSP #328

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

alashchev17
Copy link
Collaborator

@alashchev17 alashchev17 commented Feb 6, 2025

Feature: Using integration icons from LSP

Description

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, only code improvements)
  • Documentation update

Screenshots (if applicable)

New icons

New icons

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.
  • I have updated the documentation where necessary.

@alashchev17 alashchev17 changed the title [wip]: Feat/integration icons from lsp Feature: Using integration icons from LSP Feb 6, 2025
@alashchev17 alashchev17 marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2025 16:48
@alashchev17 alashchev17 merged commit e18be16 into alpha Feb 7, 2025
2 checks passed
@alashchev17 alashchev17 deleted the feat/integration-icons-from-lsp branch February 7, 2025 12:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants