Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support raising or eliminating bounds on stm? #1

Open
MichaelXavier opened this issue Aug 5, 2019 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2
Open

Support raising or eliminating bounds on stm? #1

MichaelXavier opened this issue Aug 5, 2019 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #2

Comments

@MichaelXavier
Copy link

Would you accept a PR that raised or preferable removed the upper bound on STM? This is preventing wrecker from working on newer versions of STM. stm's API is pretty stable and this library is pretty simple, so I'd recommend just removing the upper bound and then dealing with compile issues if and when they come up.
MichaelXavier added a commit to Soostone/next-ref that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2019
@MichaelXavier
Remove some upper bounds
8565074 
This is for skedgeme#1. This builds successfully with the latest LTS and all
tests pass.
@MichaelXavier MichaelXavier linked a pull request Aug 5, 2019 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 raise stm bound Soostone/next-ref
1 participant
@MichaelXavier