[Merged by Bors] - Use peeking_take_while in BlockReplayer #4803
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
michaelsproul
added
ready-for-review
macladson
approved these changes
Oct 5, 2023
michaelsproul
added
ready-for-merge
|
Thanks guys! bors r+ |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2023
## Issue Addressed While reviewing #4801 I noticed that our use of `take_while` in the block replayer means that if a state root iterator _with gaps_ is provided, some additonal state roots will be dropped unnecessarily. In practice the impact is small, because once there's _one_ state root miss, the whole tree hash cache needs to be built anyway, and subsequent misses are less costly. However this was still a little inefficient, so I figured it's better to fix it. ## Proposed Changes Use [`peeking_take_while`](https://docs.rs/itertools/latest/itertools/trait.Itertools.html#method.peeking_take_while) to avoid consuming the next element when checking whether it satisfies the slot predicate. ## Additional Info There's a gist here that shows the basic dynamics in isolation: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=40b623cc0febf9ed51705d476ab140c5. Changing the `peeking_take_while` to a `take_while` causes the assert to fail. Similarly I've added a new test `block_replayer_peeking_state_roots` which fails if the same change is applied inside `get_state_root`.
|
Pull request successfully merged into unstable. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.
|
bors
bot
changed the title
Woodpile37
pushed a commit
to Woodpile37/lighthouse
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2024
## Issue Addressed While reviewing sigp#4801 I noticed that our use of `take_while` in the block replayer means that if a state root iterator _with gaps_ is provided, some additonal state roots will be dropped unnecessarily. In practice the impact is small, because once there's _one_ state root miss, the whole tree hash cache needs to be built anyway, and subsequent misses are less costly. However this was still a little inefficient, so I figured it's better to fix it. ## Proposed Changes Use [`peeking_take_while`](https://docs.rs/itertools/latest/itertools/trait.Itertools.html#method.peeking_take_while) to avoid consuming the next element when checking whether it satisfies the slot predicate. ## Additional Info There's a gist here that shows the basic dynamics in isolation: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=40b623cc0febf9ed51705d476ab140c5. Changing the `peeking_take_while` to a `take_while` causes the assert to fail. Similarly I've added a new test `block_replayer_peeking_state_roots` which fails if the same change is applied inside `get_state_root`.
Woodpile37
pushed a commit
to Woodpile37/lighthouse
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2024
## Issue Addressed While reviewing sigp#4801 I noticed that our use of `take_while` in the block replayer means that if a state root iterator _with gaps_ is provided, some additonal state roots will be dropped unnecessarily. In practice the impact is small, because once there's _one_ state root miss, the whole tree hash cache needs to be built anyway, and subsequent misses are less costly. However this was still a little inefficient, so I figured it's better to fix it. ## Proposed Changes Use [`peeking_take_while`](https://docs.rs/itertools/latest/itertools/trait.Itertools.html#method.peeking_take_while) to avoid consuming the next element when checking whether it satisfies the slot predicate. ## Additional Info There's a gist here that shows the basic dynamics in isolation: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=40b623cc0febf9ed51705d476ab140c5. Changing the `peeking_take_while` to a `take_while` causes the assert to fail. Similarly I've added a new test `block_replayer_peeking_state_roots` which fails if the same change is applied inside `get_state_root`.
Woodpile37
pushed a commit
to Woodpile37/lighthouse
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2024
## Issue Addressed While reviewing sigp#4801 I noticed that our use of `take_while` in the block replayer means that if a state root iterator _with gaps_ is provided, some additonal state roots will be dropped unnecessarily. In practice the impact is small, because once there's _one_ state root miss, the whole tree hash cache needs to be built anyway, and subsequent misses are less costly. However this was still a little inefficient, so I figured it's better to fix it. ## Proposed Changes Use [`peeking_take_while`](https://docs.rs/itertools/latest/itertools/trait.Itertools.html#method.peeking_take_while) to avoid consuming the next element when checking whether it satisfies the slot predicate. ## Additional Info There's a gist here that shows the basic dynamics in isolation: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=40b623cc0febf9ed51705d476ab140c5. Changing the `peeking_take_while` to a `take_while` causes the assert to fail. Similarly I've added a new test `block_replayer_peeking_state_roots` which fails if the same change is applied inside `get_state_root`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue Addressed
While reviewing #4801 I noticed that our use of
take_whilein the block replayer means that if a state root iterator with gaps is provided, some additonal state roots will be dropped unnecessarily. In practice the impact is small, because once there's one state root miss, the whole tree hash cache needs to be built anyway, and subsequent misses are less costly. However this was still a little inefficient, so I figured it's better to fix it.Proposed Changes
Use
peeking_take_whileto avoid consuming the next element when checking whether it satisfies the slot predicate.Additional Info
There's a gist here that shows the basic dynamics in isolation: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=40b623cc0febf9ed51705d476ab140c5. Changing the
peeking_take_whileto atake_whilecauses the assert to fail. Similarly I've added a new testblock_replayer_peeking_state_rootswhich fails if the same change is applied insideget_state_root.