Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump loco to 0.14.0 #202

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

chore: bump loco to 0.14.0 #202

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

jonaro00
Copy link
Member

Description of change

updates loco hello-world template to what you get with latest main on loco (after loco-rs/loco#1169 merged), loco new + cargo loco generate deployment --kind shuttle

How has this been tested? (if applicable)

local run and deploying works

@jonaro00
Copy link
Member Author

cc @kaplanelad @jondot

@kaplanelad
Copy link
Contributor

Great!

We also have additional templates available:

  • API server with a database
  • Server-side rendering using HTMX/HTML
  • Client-side rendering

Let me know if you're interested, and I can open a PR to add these templates

@jonaro00
Copy link
Member Author

Since loco new + generate deployment is more sophisticated than shuttle init, I think we can keep this repo to the minimal example to reduce maintenance burden, and encourage loco new.

@jonaro00 jonaro00 merged commit 0a3a9bb into shuttle-hq:main Jan 14, 2025
3 checks passed
@jonaro00 jonaro00 deleted the loco-14 branch January 14, 2025 12:34
@kaplanelad
Copy link
Contributor

@jonaro00
When I run shuttle init and select a template from one of the supported frameworks, the current suggestion for Loco is an API template without database integration.

I believe adding another template that includes database integration—seamlessly configured to work with Shuttle—would provide significant value to customers.

@jonaro00
Copy link
Member Author

True. Created #203

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants