- Join Sherlock Discord
- Submit findings using the issue page in your private contest repo (label issues as med or high)
- Read for more details
Blast
any standard ERC20 & our own custom ERC20
None
No
None
No
No
TRUSTED
TRUSTED
No
Q: Is the code/contract expected to comply with any EIPs? Are there specific assumptions around adhering to those EIPs that Watsons should be aware of?
Only ERC20
As per the business requirement, we have only one instance that is being controlled by the admin i.e. allocation based on completed missions
N/A - One ongoing
Q: Are there any off-chain mechanisms or off-chain procedures for the protocol (keeper bots, input validation expectations, etc)?
Yes, there are certain missions which are being tracked off-chain and based on the completed missions users/investors will get allocations.
Q: In case of external protocol integrations, are the risks of external contracts pausing or executing an emergency withdrawal acceptable? If not, Watsons will submit issues related to these situations that can harm your protocol's functionality.
Acceptable
Q: Do you expect to use any of the following tokens with non-standard behaviour with the smart contracts?
No
https://zap-2.gitbook.io/zaponblast/
zap-launches-contracts @ 671cf33bc2e6588542fe85a9cf7004e4a2b77d81
- zap-launches-contracts/contracts/Admin.sol
- zap-launches-contracts/contracts/interfaces/ITokenSale.sol
zap-contracts-labs @ 1e0e114f8296c0fff62b8a2a96681eb357b0c0aa
- zap-contracts-labs/contracts/Admin.sol
- zap-contracts-labs/contracts/ERC20Factory.sol
- zap-contracts-labs/contracts/SimpleERC20.sol
- zap-contracts-labs/contracts/TokenSale.sol
- zap-contracts-labs/contracts/Vesting.sol
- zap-contracts-labs/contracts/VestingFactory.sol
- zap-contracts-labs/contracts/interfaces/ITokenSale.sol
zap-launches-contracts @ 671cf33bc2e6588542fe85a9cf7004e4a2b77d81