Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Force using mcap polyfill on EOS browsers #4630

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2022

Conversation

matvp91
Copy link
Contributor

@matvp91 matvp91 commented Oct 28, 2022

The MCap API on the EOS set-top boxes is rather buggy thus we're relying on the polyfill instead.

@avelad avelad added type: bug Something isn't working correctly priority: P2 Smaller impact or easy workaround labels Oct 28, 2022
@avelad avelad added this to the v4.3 milestone Oct 28, 2022
@avelad avelad requested review from joeyparrish and avelad October 28, 2022 10:05
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Incremental code coverage: 100.00%

@joeyparrish joeyparrish merged commit 6191d58 into shaka-project:main Oct 28, 2022
joeyparrish pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2022
The MCap API on the EOS set-top boxes is rather buggy thus we're relying
on the polyfill instead.
joeyparrish pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2022
The MCap API on the EOS set-top boxes is rather buggy thus we're relying
on the polyfill instead.
joeyparrish pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2022
The MCap API on the EOS set-top boxes is rather buggy thus we're relying
on the polyfill instead.
joeyparrish pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2022
The MCap API on the EOS set-top boxes is rather buggy thus we're relying
on the polyfill instead.
joeyparrish pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2022
The MCap API on the EOS set-top boxes is rather buggy thus we're relying
on the polyfill instead.
joeyparrish pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2022
The MCap API on the EOS set-top boxes is rather buggy thus we're relying
on the polyfill instead.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the status: archived Archived and locked; will not be updated label Jul 25, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 25, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
priority: P2 Smaller impact or easy workaround status: archived Archived and locked; will not be updated type: bug Something isn't working correctly
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants