Only allow links access via permalinks

[qwertygc]

Hello ! J'aime bien le concept, et je voulais savoir si, quand on est pas connecté, il n'y pas la liste des liens, (il faut être abonné au RSS pour voir les articles ou avoir le permalien).

Si ça peut se faire sous forme de plugin... ?

[mro]

Hä?

[ArthurHoaro]

He's talking about a 'no homepage' option, for privacy matters. So no multiple link list if you're logged out.

[mro]

thx.

[alexisju]

I guess it should be possible, but i think it will be easier to use a custom template than a plugin for that.

[nodiscc]

I see this as an addition to "Hide public links".

• All links are hidden
• There is a RSS feed whose URL is generated randomly and bypasses "hide public links".
• Accessing a permalink bypasses "hide public link"

[alexisju]

n.survol.fr (the website given in link by @qwertygc) is just a wordpress website "without" frontpage, but all articles are published and online.

About Shaarli the same way is more like a specific template than a new core feature.

Hovewer, as @nodiscc suggest, when the shaarli is private it could be interesting to be able to generate a private rss link too.

[ArthurHoaro]

I agree with @alexisju. A "featureless" template is a good way to make Shaarli only able to display permalinks.

Also, I'm more in favor of adding a 'share' URL to give access to a private link, or any link to make it work with HIDE_PUBLIC_LINKS. But it's going to be more difficult to do since we don't load private links for logged out users.

[qwertygc]

I have test the condition in linklist.html, but is hide, also if we search. I search just to hide for listing the links, not in search or tag

OK, in linklist.html,
l 66 : {if="isLoggedIn() || isset($_GET['searchterm']) || isset($_GET['searchtags'])"}

l116 {/if}

[qwertygc]

I have create a pull request.

[ArthurHoaro]

What's the point of hiding shaares in linklist if you can see them through the search, tags, daily, etc?

[qwertygc]

L'idée c'est juste rendre plus opacte le shaarli, comme décrit dans l'article.

[ArthurHoaro]

Opaque? Hmm... The blog post author writes something like this:

Yes, everything is accessible for anyone who would care to. Posts are browsable through pagination, RSS feed, or a search engine.

I'm talking about opacity because it's not closed, only harder to access. It protects me against quick "who am I" search.

I'm sorry but it feels like a pointless hack to me. I'd rather hide everything and eventually make permalink accessible (like etherpad for example), or show everything that's public.

[nodiscc]

Agreed, if ever this gets implemented it needs to only allow access to RSS/permalinks and not allow listing of links; otherwise there is no point to it - just hide the default page.

@qwertygc what you describe can easily be done with a simple .htaccess or server access restrictions/configuration (throw a 403, 404 or a custom page for URLs like ^shaarli/\? ^shaarli/\?page=.*$, eg see rewriterules. I suggest closing #478.

[qwertygc]

Si je comprends, on le met pas ?

[alexisju]

Perso, je ne pense pas non plus qu'il faille que ce soit intégré par défaut ; ça sort un peu de l'essence même de Shaarli. Par contre, n'hésite pas à développer ton template et le partager (en ajoutant un lien dans le wiki).