-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 598
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Store Request::params as a slice, instead of owning ArrayVec #2694
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GnomedDev
force-pushed
the
params-slice
branch
from
January 6, 2024 23:13
f4a7787
to
edad451
Compare
arqunis
added
enhancement
An improvement to Serenity.
breaking change
The public API is changed, resulting in miscompilations or unexpected new behaviour for users
labels
Jan 6, 2024
arqunis
approved these changes
Jan 7, 2024
arqunis
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2024
Follow-up to #2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2024
This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2024
Follow-up to #2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2024
This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2024
Follow-up to #2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
Follow-up to #2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
Follow-up to #2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
Follow-up to #2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
Follow-up to #2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
mkrasnitski
pushed a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
mkrasnitski
added a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
mkrasnitski
pushed a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
mkrasnitski
added a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
Follow-up to #2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2024
This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2024
Follow-up to #2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2024
This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2024
Follow-up to #2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
GnomedDev
pushed a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
mkrasnitski
pushed a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2024
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
mkrasnitski
added a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2024
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2025
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2025
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
mkrasnitski
pushed a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2025
…nity-rs#2694) This, 1. shrinks the size of Request, when copied around, as it doesn't have to store the max capacity at all times 2. shrinks llvm-lines (compile time metric) for my bot in debug from `1,153,519` to `1,131,480` as no monomorphisation has to be performed for `MAX_PARAMS`.
mkrasnitski
added a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2025
Follow-up to serenity-rs#2694. When `Request::params` was made into an ArrayVec, the `Option` around it was removed in order to avoid having to add a turbofish on `None` to specify the value of `MAX_PARAMS`. Also, `Request::new` also needed to be changed so that the value of `MAX_PARAMS` could be inferred. Now that the field is a slice again, we can wrap it in `Option` again (at no cost to size, thanks to niche opts). We ensure we never store the redundant `Some(&[])` by checking for an empty slice and storing `None` instead. This way, we ensure we never read an empty slice out of the `Some` variant.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking change
The public API is changed, resulting in miscompilations or unexpected new behaviour for users
enhancement
An improvement to Serenity.
http
Related to the `http` module.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This,
1,153,519
to1,131,480
as no monomorphisation has to be performed forMAX_PARAMS
.