You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A long ago, I patched the original JTable RowSorter to use Arrays.parallelSort() instead of Arrays.sort() to speed up column sorting. Arrays.parallelSort() uses the ForkJoin framework to do the work. But surprisingly, at least to me, seems its results may not become visible to other threads and it needs external synchronization to become visible. One consequence of this was reported by @patrickdalla here: #1333 (comment) #1333 (comment)
This affects 4.0.x and also several 3.x versions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A long ago, I patched the original JTable RowSorter to use Arrays.parallelSort() instead of Arrays.sort() to speed up column sorting. Arrays.parallelSort() uses the ForkJoin framework to do the work. But surprisingly, at least to me, seems its results may not become visible to other threads and it needs external synchronization to become visible. One consequence of this was reported by @patrickdalla here:
#1333 (comment)
#1333 (comment)
This affects 4.0.x and also several 3.x versions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: