Remove instance of "Esmail EL BoB"

[MagicLike]

Esmail is actively forbidding members or supporters of the LGBTQIA+ community to use their services via a TOS document*.
This is absolutely queerphobic and extremely discriminating. Therefore I ask to remove their instance searx.esmailelbob.xyz / searx.esmail5pdn24shtvieloeedh7ehz3nrwcdivnfhfcedl7gf4kwddhkqd.onion from the list, to not further support their actions.

*See the commit here: https://web.archive.org/web/20230524152815/https://git.esmailelbob.xyz/esmail/upptime/src/branch/master/pri-tos.md

Metastem/Wikiless#29 (comment)

[unixfox]

Every removal should be linked to a rule violation. The owner has to be then notified of the violation and we ask to solve the issue or the instance gets removed.

I'm not against adding a new rule but I don't know where to draw the line.

A lot of public instances are already blocking a region or a group of people. That can be for blocking bots like this instance who blocked China for reducing the amount of bots in order to bring back a working user experience: #324 (comment)

We could have a rule stating somewhere around these lines: "you can block a group of people for the only sole reason of protecting your instance or keep a working user experience for the majority of the users of your instance". But then this should be a bit more defined because the term " defending" is still very broad.

[IF-Adin]

@unixfox I think that should not be the focus. A defensive action requires evidence. Attacks coming from an ip range are evidence. You can not assign ip ranges to gay people, nor are they likely to organize in such a fashion.

For everything else, there is always the basic human rights to refer to?

[unixfox]

I've opened an issue for the new rule that will be added, please see: #346

Unlocking the issue but please keep a civil discussion or I'll have to lock again the issue.

[IF-Adin]

@unixfox To be honest, i had not even noticed that you had closed the issue.

Thank you for the quick response.

[unixfox]

Warning sent to the maintainer: #14 (comment)