Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary goldilocks patch #481

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

matthiasgoergens
Copy link
Collaborator

We specify Goldilocks as a git dependency, but then immediately patch it. Let's stop doing that.

We specify Goldilocks as a git dependency, but then immediately patch
it.  Let's stop doing that.
@matthiasgoergens matthiasgoergens requested review from naure and hero78119 and removed request for naure October 28, 2024 08:46
@yczhangsjtu
Copy link
Collaborator

Maybe fork goldilocks repo to scroll-tech instead of leave it in a personal repo? @kunxian-xia @dreamATD @matthiasgoergens

@hero78119
Copy link
Collaborator

hero78119 commented Oct 28, 2024

Maybe fork goldilocks repo to scroll-tech instead of leave it in a personal repo? @kunxian-xia @dreamATD @matthiasgoergens

+1 for migrate to scroll-tech for temp. The ultimate solution suggest follow #483 which porting Goldilock from plonky2 instead

@matthiasgoergens
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yes, we should do all of these things.

I'm just cleaning up the patching here in the meantime.

@matthiasgoergens matthiasgoergens merged commit ef5caa9 into master Oct 28, 2024
6 checks passed
@matthiasgoergens matthiasgoergens deleted the matthias/less-patching branch October 28, 2024 09:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants