Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

salt: Ensure node exists before marking it as bootstrap #2610

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 9, 2020

Conversation

TeddyAndrieux
Copy link
Collaborator

Component:

'salt'

Context:

#2601

Summary:

In restore script, we configure a new bootstrap node according to a
backup file and just after kubelet installation we try to mark the node
as bootstrap node but kubelet may take some time to register so the
salt state may fail.
This commit adds a state to check that the node exists with a retry logic
in case kubelet not register yet when calling the salt state


Fixes: #2601

@TeddyAndrieux TeddyAndrieux requested a review from a team June 8, 2020 17:33
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 8, 2020

Hello teddyandrieux,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 8, 2020

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/1.0
  • development/1.1
  • development/1.2
  • development/1.3
  • development/2.0
  • development/2.1
  • development/2.2
  • development/2.3

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 8, 2020

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • one peer

Peer approvals must include at least 1 approval from the following list:

Copy link
Contributor

@gdemonet gdemonet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small change on the helper, otherwise LGTM!

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • one peer

Peer approvals must include at least 1 approval from the following list:

The following reviewers are expecting changes from the author, or must review again:

Add a function in our kubernetes custom salt module to check that a
kubernetes object exists or not
@TeddyAndrieux TeddyAndrieux force-pushed the bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore branch from affec23 to 19de953 Compare June 9, 2020 08:06
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

History mismatch

Merge commit #1bbd182c1fad5f6bc80de147892482ec225b7548 on the integration branch
w/2.5/bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore is merging a branch which is neither the current
branch bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore nor the development branch
development/2.5.

It is likely due to a rebase of the branch bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore and the
merge is not possible until all related w/* branches are deleted or updated.

Please use the reset command to have me reinitialize these branches.

@TeddyAndrieux
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/reset

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

Reset complete

I have successfully deleted this pull request's integration branches.

@TeddyAndrieux
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/1.0
  • development/1.1
  • development/1.2
  • development/1.3
  • development/2.0
  • development/2.1
  • development/2.2
  • development/2.3

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • one peer

Peer approvals must include at least 1 approval from the following list:

The following reviewers are expecting changes from the author, or must review again:

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • one peer

Peer approvals must include at least 1 approval from the following list:

The following reviewers are expecting changes from the author, or must review again:

The following options are set: approve

@TeddyAndrieux TeddyAndrieux requested a review from gdemonet June 9, 2020 08:15
gdemonet
gdemonet previously approved these changes Jun 9, 2020
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore.

The following options are set: approve

In restore script we configure a new bootstrap node according to a
backup file and just after kubelet installation we try to mark the node
as bootstrap node but kubelet may take some time to register so the
salt state may fail.
This commit add a state to check that the node exists with a retry logic
in case kubelet not register yet when calling the salt state

Fixes: #2601
@TeddyAndrieux TeddyAndrieux force-pushed the bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore branch from 19de953 to 37abdfd Compare June 9, 2020 08:25
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

History mismatch

Merge commit #19de953e234c91d0a0002efc3f0f6a3b456d1cc2 on the integration branch
w/2.5/bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore is merging a branch which is neither the current
branch bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore nor the development branch
development/2.5.

It is likely due to a rebase of the branch bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore and the
merge is not possible until all related w/* branches are deleted or updated.

Please use the reset command to have me reinitialize these branches.

The following options are set: approve

@TeddyAndrieux
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/reset

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

Reset complete

I have successfully deleted this pull request's integration branches.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/1.0
  • development/1.1
  • development/1.2
  • development/1.3
  • development/2.0
  • development/2.1
  • development/2.2
  • development/2.3

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • one peer

Peer approvals must include at least 1 approval from the following list:

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch w/2.5/bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch w/2.6/bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/2.4

  • ✔️ development/2.5

  • ✔️ development/2.6

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/1.0
  • development/1.1
  • development/1.2
  • development/1.3
  • development/2.0
  • development/2.1
  • development/2.2
  • development/2.3

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 9, 2020

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/2.4

  • ✔️ development/2.5

  • ✔️ development/2.6

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/1.0
  • development/1.1
  • development/1.2
  • development/1.3
  • development/2.0
  • development/2.1
  • development/2.2
  • development/2.3

Please check the status of the associated issue GH-2601.

Goodbye teddyandrieux.

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 37abdfd into development/2.4 Jun 9, 2020
@bert-e bert-e deleted the bugfix/GH-2601-fix-bootstrap-restore branch June 9, 2020 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants