You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The interpolation itself already supports higher depths, but the usability might need some tuning. We should clarify the following questions:
Is a depth of 4 meant as the exact depth or as the maximum depth? In other words: what happens if the depth is set to 4, but I only advance by 3 slices and brush. Will this
use the volume data from 4 slices ago for interpolation (which is likely interpolated itself and therefore not a good source)
use the volume data from 3 slices ago for interpolation
don't do any interpolation?
In general, can/should we let the user know from which slice the next brush action would use data for the interpolation?
Can we let the user know which slices where drawn by interpolation so that proof-reading of interpolated slices is easy to do after annotating a bunch of slices?
philippotto
changed the title
Follow-up: Volume Interpolation with depth > 2
Follow-up: Enable volume Interpolation with depth > 2 and clarify usability
Apr 29, 2022
Detailed Description
The interpolation itself already supports higher depths, but the usability might need some tuning. We should clarify the following questions:
Context
See #6162
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: