Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Follow-up: Enable volume Interpolation with depth > 2 and clarify usability #6183

Closed
philippotto opened this issue Apr 29, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6235
Closed

Follow-up: Enable volume Interpolation with depth > 2 and clarify usability #6183

philippotto opened this issue Apr 29, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6235

Comments

@philippotto
Copy link
Member

Detailed Description

The interpolation itself already supports higher depths, but the usability might need some tuning. We should clarify the following questions:

  • Is a depth of 4 meant as the exact depth or as the maximum depth? In other words: what happens if the depth is set to 4, but I only advance by 3 slices and brush. Will this
    • use the volume data from 4 slices ago for interpolation (which is likely interpolated itself and therefore not a good source)
    • use the volume data from 3 slices ago for interpolation
    • don't do any interpolation?
  • In general, can/should we let the user know from which slice the next brush action would use data for the interpolation?
  • Can we let the user know which slices where drawn by interpolation so that proof-reading of interpolated slices is easy to do after annotating a bunch of slices?

Context

See #6162

@philippotto philippotto changed the title Follow-up: Volume Interpolation with depth > 2 Follow-up: Enable volume Interpolation with depth > 2 and clarify usability Apr 29, 2022
@philippotto philippotto self-assigned this May 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
1 participant