You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, multiple color layers have an opacity slider. What's rendered is a weighted sum of the two color layers. Sliders can be moved independently.
In our use case, where we have the raw data and the predictions as an RGB color layer, this doesn't really make sense, as can be seen here
I believe we should enforce that the sum of weights equals 1. I see two options:
When sliding one slider, automatically adjust the others.
Fix the ordering of color layers, then implement a behavior as in Photoshop, where some layers are on top of others.
However, this solution might not work for fluorescence data where layers are mapped to different colors and then are added with weight 1. Not sure how to solve this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We discussed that the actual use case of the issue is to quickly toggle the visibilities between layers. We agreed on using ctrl+click-on-visibility-check to make the clicked layer exclusively visible.
philippotto
changed the title
Improve Blending of multiple color layers
Make it easy to exclusively render one data layer
May 2, 2019
…ing visibility (#4061)
* allow to make a layer exclusively visible by pressing ctrl when changing the visibility (fixes#3896)
* change ctrl toggle behavior to match gimps behavior
* update changelog and docs
Currently, multiple color layers have an opacity slider. What's rendered is a weighted sum of the two color layers. Sliders can be moved independently.
In our use case, where we have the raw data and the predictions as an RGB color layer, this doesn't really make sense, as can be seen here
I believe we should enforce that the sum of weights equals 1. I see two options:
However, this solution might not work for fluorescence data where layers are mapped to different colors and then are added with weight 1. Not sure how to solve this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: